Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30927913›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2019

One-minute stair climbing, 50-foot walk, and timed up-and-go were responsive measures for patients with chronic low back pain undergoing lumbar fusion surgery.

Max Jakobsson, Helena Brisby, Annelie Gutke, Mari Lundberg, Rob Smeets

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Max JakobssonDepartment of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, House R, Göteborgsvägen 31, S-431 80, Mölndal, Sweden. max.jakobsson@gu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5629-5627
Helena BrisbyDepartment of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, House R, Göteborgsvägen 31, S-431 80, Mölndal, Sweden.
Annelie GutkeDivision of Physiotherapy, Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Box 455, S-405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Mari LundbergDepartment of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Rob SmeetsDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Research School of CAPRHI, Maastricht University, CIR Revalidatie, Zwolle/Eindhoven, PO Box 616, 6200, Maastricht, MD, The Netherlands.

Funding

AFA Försäkring 120216Doctor Felix Neubergh Research Grants 2017-346Eurospine Research Grants TFR 8-2014The Health and Medical Care Executive Board of the Västra Götaland Region (VGR) N/AVetenskapsrådet 2015-02511
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysical capacity tasks are useful tools to assess functioning in patients with low back pain (LBP), but evidence is scarce regarding the responsiveness (ability to detect change over time) and minimal important change (MIC). The aim was to investigate the responsiveness and MIC of 5-min walk, 1-min stair climbing, 50-ft walk, and timed up-and-go in patients with chronic LBP undergoing lumbar fusion surgery.

methodsIn this clinimetric study, 118 patients scheduled for lumbar fusion surgery for motion-elicited chronic LBP with degenerative changes were included. All patients performed the physical capacity tasks 5-min walk, 1-min stair climbing, 50-ft walk, and timed up-and-go 8-12 weeks before and six months after surgery. Responsiveness was evaluated by testing five a priori responsiveness hypotheses. The hypotheses concerned the area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve and correlations (Spearman's rho) between the change scores of the physical capacity tasks, the Oswestry Disability Index 2.0 (ODI), and back pain intensity measured with visual analog scale (VAS). At least 80% of the hypotheses would have to be confirmed for adequate responsiveness. Absolute and relative MICs for improvement were determined by the optimal cut-off point of the ROC curve based on the classification of improved and unchanged patients according to construct-specific global perceived effect (GPE) scales.

resultsOne-minute stair climbing, 50-ft walk and timed up-and-go displayed adequate responsiveness (≥ 80% of hypotheses confirmed), while 5-min walk did not (40% of hypotheses confirmed). The absolute MICs for improvement were 45.5 m for 5-min walk, 20.0 steps for 1-min stair climbing, - 0.6 s for 50-ft walk, and - 1.3 s for timed up-and-go.

conclusionsThe results of responsiveness for 1-min stair climbing, 50-ft walk, and timed up-and-go implies that these have the ability to detect changes in physical capacity over time in patients with chronic LBP who have undergone lumbar fusion surgery.

Indexed as

Disability EvaluationMinimal Clinically Important DifferenceSpinal FusionAdultChronic PainExercise TestFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLow Back PainLumbar VertebraeMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative PeriodPreoperative PeriodProspective StudiesFunctional testsHealth outcome assessmentMinimal clinically important differenceMinimal important changePerformance-based measuresPhysical performance testsSensitivity to change

Identifiers

PMID30927913
PMCPMC6441231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.