Observational studyBMC anesthesiology2019
Assessment of agreement and interchangeability between the TEG5000 and TEG6S thromboelastography haemostasis analysers: a prospective validation study.
Observational study in BMC anesthesiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04917965 (Thromboelastographic Profile in Healthy Newborns and Infants of Diabetic Mothers Using TEG6s), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Thromboelastographic Profile in Healthy Newborns and Infants of Diabetic Mothers Using TEG6s
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimal protamine dosing after cardiopulmonary bypass: The PRODOSE adaptive randomised controlled trial.PLoS medicine · 2021Trial
- Identification of Coagulation Phenotypes Using Viscoelastic and Conventional Assays During Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Hierarchical Clustering Analysis.Artificial organs · 2026Observational
- Discrepancy Between Conventional Coagulation Tests and Thromboelastography During the Early Postoperative Phase of Liver Resection in Neoplastic Patients: A Prospective Study Using the New-Generation TEGJournal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Measurement of Blood Viscoelasticity Using Thromboelastography.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Changes of Coagulation and Fibrinolytic Status Detected by Thromboelastography (TEG6sHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Viscoelastic Hemostatic Assays: A Primer on Legacy and New Generation Devices.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Hemorrhagic Resuscitation Guided by Viscoelastography in Far-Forward Combat and Austere Civilian Environments: Goal-Directed Whole-Blood and Blood-Component Therapy Far from the Trauma Center.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Viscoelastometric Testing to Assess Hemostasis of COVID-19: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Whole Blood, Fixed Ratio, or Goal-Directed Blood Component Therapy for the Initial Resuscitation of Severely Hemorrhaging Trauma Patients: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Assessing TEG6S reliability between devices and across multiple time points: A prospective thromboelastography validation study.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- A comparison between the TEG 6s and TEG 5000 analyzers to assess coagulation in trauma patients.The journal of trauma and acute care surgery · 2020Observational
- Thromboelastography for the Prevention of Perioperative Venous Thromboembolism in Orthopedics.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisReview
- Comparison of Thromboelastography and Conventional Coagulation Tests in Patients With Severe Liver Disease.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTEG6S® and TEG5000® (Haemonetics Corp, USA) are haemostasis analysers that measure viscoelasticity properties of whole blood. Both use different mechanisms to assess similar components of the coagulation process. The aim of this study was to assess agreement and interchangeability between the TEG6S and TEG5000 analysers.
methods3.5 mL whole blood was collected from 25 adult patients in a tertiary intensive care unit (ICU). Analysis was performed using TEG6S and TEG5000 haemostatic platforms. Agreement between platforms was measured using Lin's concordance coefficient (Lin's CC), further validated using intraclass correlation coefficients and reduced major axis regression (RMAR).
resultsSixteen (64%) patients were male; mean (range) age: 59yo (23-86). TEG6S and TEG5000 systems were broadly interchangeable. The majority of TEG variables demonstrated almost perfect or substantial agreement and minimal proportional bias (maximum amplitude demonstrated a fixed bias). LY30%, however, demonstrated poor agreement and a proportional bias. Lin's CC coefficients (95% CI, RMAR slope, intercept) between TEG6S and TEG5000 variables were: R time: 0.78 (0.64-0.92, 0.76, 0.92); K time: 0.82 (0.69-0.94, 1.30, - 0.93); alpha angle: 0.79 (0.64-0.95, 1.04, - 1.43); maximum amplitude (MA): 0.90 (0.83-0.96, 0.99, - 5.0); LY30%: 0.34 (0.1-0.58, 0.43, 0.04).
conclusionsAdult patients with critical illness demonstrate almost perfect agreement in the R time and MA, substantial agreement in K time and alpha angle, but poor agreement in LY30%, as measured by the TEG6S and TEG5000 analysers. With the exception of LY30%, the TEG6S and TEG5000 platforms appear interchangeable. This has important implications for use in clinical practice and multi-site research programs.
trial registrationANZCRT number: 12617000062325 , registered 12/Jan17. Retrospectively registered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.