Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30927366›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2019

Children Use Regions in the Visual Processing and Executive Function Networks during a Subsequent Memory Reading Task.

Rola Farah, Rebecca S Coalson, Steven E Petersen, Bradley L Schlaggar, Tzipi Horowitz-Kraus

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Lower engagement of cognitive control in children on ChatGPT.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Rola FarahEducational Neuroimaging Center, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering.
Rebecca S CoalsonDepartments of Neurology and Radiology.
Steven E PetersenDivision of Neuropsychology, Department of Psychology, Washington University Medical School, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Bradley L SchlaggarKennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Tzipi Horowitz-KrausEducational Neuroimaging Center, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering.
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USKennedy Krieger Institute · USTechnion – Israel Institute of Technology · ILWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Washington University Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center-Administrative Down Syndrome SupplementU54HD087011 · NICHD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CONSTANTINO, JOHN N. · 2015 to 2019
$7.1M
The role of executive functions in reading and reading remediationR01HD086011 · NICHD · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI HOROWITZ-KRAUS, TZIPI · 2016 to 2020
$2.5M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD086011NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD087011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Memory encoding is a critical process for memory function, which is foundational for cognitive functioning including reading, and has been extensively studied using subsequent memory tasks. Research in adults using such tasks indicates the participation of visual and cognitive-control systems in remembered versus forgotten words. However, given the known developmental trajectories of these systems, the functional neuroanatomy of memory encoding in children may be different than in adults. We examined brain activation for silent word reading and checkerboard viewing during an event-related reading task in 8-12 year-old children. Results indicate greater activation for checkerboard viewing than lexical processing in early visual regions, as well as for lexical processing versus checkerboard viewing in regions in left sensorimotor mouth, cingulo-opercular and dorsal-attention networks. Greater activation for remembered than forgotten words was observed in bilateral visual system and left lateralized regions within the ventral- and dorsal-attention, cingulo-opercular and fronto-parietal networks. These findings suggest a relatively mature reliance on the cognitive-control system, but greater reliance on the visual system in children when viewing words subsequently remembered. The location of regions with greater activity for remembered words reinforces the involvement of the attention and cognitive-control systems in subsequent memory in reading.

Indexed as

ReadingCerebral CortexChildExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMemory ConsolidationVisual Perceptionchildrencognitive controlfunctional MRImemoryvisual processing

Identifiers

PMID30927366
PMCPMC7049310
OpenAlexW2926822556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.