Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30927325›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2019

The functional role of beta-oscillations in the supplementary motor area during reaching and grasping after stroke: A question of structural damage to the corticospinal tract.

Fanny Quandt, Marlene Bönstrup, Robert Schulz, Jan E Timmermann, Maike Mund, Maximilian J Wessel, Friedhelm C Hummel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fanny QuandtDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Marlene BönstrupDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Robert SchulzDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Jan E TimmermannDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Maike MundDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Maximilian J WesselDefitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Brain Mind Institute and Center for Neuroprosthetics, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland.
Friedhelm C HummelDefitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Brain Mind Institute and Center for Neuroprosthetics, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4746-4633

Funding

Defitech FoundationDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SFB936-C4 (to F.C.H)German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina LPDS 2016-01, to M.B.Wyss Foundation WCP024A to F.C.H.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hand motor function is often severely affected in stroke patients. Non-satisfying recovery limits reintegration into normal daily life. Understanding stroke-related network changes and identifying common principles that might underlie recovered motor function is a prerequisite for the development of interventional therapies to support recovery. Here, we combine the evaluation of functional activity (multichannel electroencephalography) and structural integrity (diffusion tensor imaging) in order to explain the degree of residual motor function in chronic stroke patients. By recording neural activity during a reaching and grasping task that mimics activities of daily living, the study focuses on deficit-related neural activation patterns. The study showed that the functional role of movement-related beta desynchronization in the supplementary motor area (SMA) for residual hand motor function in stroke patients depends on the microstructural integrity of the corticospinal tract (CST). In particular, in patients with damaged CST, stronger task-related activity in the SMA was associated with worse residual motor function. Neither CST damage nor functional brain activity alone sufficiently explained residual hand motor function. The findings suggest a central role of the SMA in the motor network during reaching and grasping in stroke patients, the degree of functional relevance of the SMA is depending on CST integrity.

Indexed as

AgedBeta RhythmFemaleHand StrengthHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotor CortexMotor DisordersPsychomotor PerformancePyramidal TractsRecovery of FunctionStrokeDTIEEGfunctional and structural neuroimagingmotor functionSMAstroke recovery

Identifiers

PMID30927325
PMCPMC6865486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.