Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30927170›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of biomedical engineering2019

Predictive Virtual Patient Modelling of Mechanical Ventilation: Impact of Recruitment Function.

Sophie E Morton, Jennifer L Knopp, J Geoffrey Chase, Knut Möller, Paul Docherty, Geoffrey M Shaw, Merryn Tawhai

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Quantifying neonatal patient effort using non-invasive model-based methods.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sophie E MortonDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand. sophie.morton@pg.canterbury.ac.nz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4424-6400
Jennifer L KnoppDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
J Geoffrey ChaseDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Knut MöllerInstitute of Technical Medicine, Furtwangen University, Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany.
Paul DochertyDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Geoffrey M ShawDepartment of Intensive Care, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Merryn TawhaiAuckland Bioengineering Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
University of Canterbury · NZChristchurch Hospital · NZFurtwangen University · DEUniversity of Auckland · NZ

Funding

Engineering Technology-based Innovation in Medicine (eTIME) consortium grant [eTIME 318943]EU FP7 International Research Staff Exchange Scheme (IRSES) grant #PIRSES-GA-2012-318943NZ National Science Challenge 7, Science for Technology and Innovation E6525NZ Tertiary Education Commission (TEC) fund MedTech CoRE E6391
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanical ventilation is a life-support therapy for intensive care patients suffering from respiratory failure. To reduce the current rate of ventilator-induced lung injury requires ventilator settings that are patient-, time-, and disease-specific. A common lung protective strategy is to optimise the level of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) through a recruitment manoeuvre to prevent alveolar collapse at the end of expiration and to improve gas exchange through recruitment of additional alveoli. However, this process can subject parts of the lung to excessively high pressures or volumes. This research significantly extends and more robustly validates a previously developed pulmonary mechanics model to predict lung mechanics throughout recruitment manoeuvres. In particular, the process of recruitment is more thoroughly investigated and the impact of the inclusion of expiratory data when estimating peak inspiratory pressure is assessed. Data from the McREM trial and CURE pilot trial were used to test model predictive capability and assumptions. For PEEP changes of up to and including 14 cmH

Indexed as

Patient-Specific ModelingRespiration, ArtificialAdultAgedFemaleHumansLungMaleMiddle AgedRespiratory MechanicsIn-silicoIntensive careMechanical ventilationPEEPPredictionVirtual patient

Identifiers

PMID30927170
OpenAlexW2935187411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.