ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2020
Quantitative assessment of myocardial blood flow and extracellular volume fraction using
Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Significance of Extracellular Volume of Myocardium (ECV) Assessed by Computed Tomography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Pancreatic GLP-1r binding potential is reduced in insulin-resistant pigs.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2020Article
- Explicit measurement of multi-tracer arterial input function for PET imaging using blood sampling spectroscopy.EJNMMI physics · 2020Article
- Development of a blood sample detector for multi-tracer positron emission tomography using gamma spectroscopy.EJNMMI physics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHere we evaluated the feasibility of PET with Gallium-68 (
methods8 healthy pigs underwent three sequential
resultsMBF assessed with
conclusion
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.