ArticleEuropean radiology2019
Automatic classification of ultrasound breast lesions using a deep convolutional neural network mimicking human decision-making.
Article in European radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
60 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- ESR Essentials: artificial intelligence in breast imaging-practice recommendations by the European Society of Breast Imaging.European radiology · 2026Guideline
- Article
- A non-invasive end-to-end intelligent assistance system for breast ultrasound.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Ultrasound-based artificial intelligence for breast lesion classification.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Predicting Very Early-Stage Breast Cancer in BI-RADS 3 Lesions of Large Population with Deep Learning.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- The top 100 most-cited articles on artificial intelligence in breast radiology: a bibliometric analysis.Insights into imaging · 2024Article
- Use of a commercial artificial intelligence-based mammography analysis software for improving breast ultrasound interpretations.European radiology · 2024Article
- Role of Radiology in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Cancer in Women: A Comprehensive Review.Cureus · 2024Review
- Artificial intelligence-based, semi-automated segmentation for the extraction of ultrasound-derived radiomics features in breast cancer: a prospective multicenter study.La Radiologia medica · 2024Article
- Automatic Detection of Post-Operative Clips in Mammography Using a U-Net Convolutional Neural Network.Journal of imaging · 2024Article
- A Review of Artificial Intelligence in Breast Imaging.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2024Review
- Artificial intelligence-assisted ultrasound imaging in hemophilia: research, development, and evaluation of hemarthrosis and synovitis detection.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2024Article
- Use of artificial intelligence in breast surgery: a narrative review.Gland surgery · 2024Review
- Barriers and facilitators of artificial intelligence conception and implementation for breast imaging diagnosis in clinical practice: a scoping review.European radiology · 2024Article
- Diagnostic performance of deep learning in ultrasound diagnosis of breast cancer: a systematic review.NPJ precision oncology · 2024Review
- Artificial intelligence in breast imaging: Current situation and clinical challenges.Exploration (Beijing, China) · 2023Review
- Ceusia-Breast: computer-aided diagnosis with contrast enhanced ultrasound image analysis for breast lesions.BMC medical imaging · 2023Article
- Article
- Diagnostic accuracy of automated ACR BI-RADS breast density classification using deep convolutional neural networks.European radiology · 2023Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate a deep convolutional neural network (dCNN) for detection, highlighting, and classification of ultrasound (US) breast lesions mimicking human decision-making according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). METHODS AND MATERIALS: One thousand nineteen breast ultrasound images from 582 patients (age 56.3 ± 11.5 years) were linked to the corresponding radiological report. Lesions were categorized into the following classes: no tissue, normal breast tissue, BI-RADS 2 (cysts, lymph nodes), BI-RADS 3 (non-cystic mass), and BI-RADS 4-5 (suspicious). To test the accuracy of the dCNN, one internal dataset (101 images) and one external test dataset (43 images) were evaluated by the dCNN and two independent readers. Radiological reports, histopathological results, and follow-up examinations served as reference. The performances of the dCNN and the humans were quantified in terms of classification accuracies and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
resultsIn the internal test dataset, the classification accuracy of the dCNN differentiating BI-RADS 2 from BI-RADS 3-5 lesions was 87.1% (external 93.0%) compared with that of human readers with 79.2 ± 1.9% (external 95.3 ± 2.3%). For the classification of BI-RADS 2-3 versus BI-RADS 4-5, the dCNN reached a classification accuracy of 93.1% (external 95.3%), whereas the classification accuracy of humans yielded 91.6 ± 5.4% (external 94.1 ± 1.2%). The AUC on the internal dataset was 83.8 (external 96.7) for the dCNN and 84.6 ± 2.3 (external 90.9 ± 2.9) for the humans.
conclusiondCNNs may be used to mimic human decision-making in the evaluation of single US images of breast lesion according to the BI-RADS catalog. The technique reaches high accuracies and may serve for standardization of highly observer-dependent US assessment. KEY POINTS: • Deep convolutional neural networks could be used to classify US breast lesions. • The implemented dCNN with its sliding window approach reaches high accuracies in the classification of US breast lesions. • Deep convolutional neural networks may serve for standardization in US BI-RADS classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30927100What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.