Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30927043›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2019

Neurophysiological, neuropsychological, and cognitive effects of 30 days of isolation.

Jan Weber, Florian Javelle, Timo Klein, Tina Foitschik, Brian Crucian, Stefan Schneider, Vera Abeln

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Cognition in zero gravity: Effects of non-terrestrial gravity on human behaviour.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. The individual and combined effects of spaceflight radiation and microgravity on biologic systems and functional outcomes.Journal of environmental science and health. Part C, Toxicology and carcinogenesis · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jan WeberInstitute of Movement and Neurosciences, German Sport University, Am Sportpark Müngersdorf 6, 50933, Cologne, Germany. jan.weber@student.uni-tuebingen.de.
Florian JavelleInstitute for Cardiology and Sports Medicine, German Sport University, Am Sportpark Müngersdorf 6, 50933, Cologne, Germany.
Timo KleinInstitute of Movement and Neurosciences, German Sport University, Am Sportpark Müngersdorf 6, 50933, Cologne, Germany.
Tina FoitschikInstitute of Movement and Neurosciences, German Sport University, Am Sportpark Müngersdorf 6, 50933, Cologne, Germany.
Brian CrucianNASA-Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Stefan SchneiderInstitute of Movement and Neurosciences, German Sport University, Am Sportpark Müngersdorf 6, 50933, Cologne, Germany.
Vera AbelnInstitute of Movement and Neurosciences, German Sport University, Am Sportpark Müngersdorf 6, 50933, Cologne, Germany.
German Sport University Cologne · DEJohnson Space Center · US

Funding

Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie 50WB1516
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing demand of space flights requires a profound knowledge of the chronologic reactions of the human body to extreme conditions. Prior studies already have shown the adverse effects of long-term isolation on psycho-physiological well-being. The chronology of the effects and whether short-term isolation periods already lead to similar effects has not been investigated. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to investigate the effects of short-term isolation (30 days) on mood, cognition, cortisol, neurotrophic factors, and brain activity. 16 participants were isolated in the Human Exploration Research Analog at NASA for 30 days. 17 non-isolated control participants were tested simultaneously. On mission days - 5, 7, 14, 28, and + 5, multiple tests including the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule-X and cognitive tests were conducted, and a 5-min resting electroencephalography was recorded. A fasted morning blood drawing was also done. Increased stress was observed via augmented cortisol levels during the isolation period. Activity within the parietal cortex was reduced over time, probably representing a neural adaptation to less external stimuli. Cognitive performance was not affected, but rather enhanced in both groups. No further significant changes in neurotrophic factors BDNF/IGF-1 and mood could be detected. These results suggest that 30 days of isolation do not have a significant impact on brain activity, neurotrophic factors, cognition, or mood, even though stress levels were significantly increased during isolation. Further studies need to address the question as to what extent increased levels of stress do not affect mental functions during isolation periods.

Indexed as

Social IsolationAdultAffectAstronautsBrain-Derived Neurotrophic FactorCognitionElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansHydrocortisoneInsulin-Like Growth Factor IMaleParietal LobeStress, PsychologicalTime FactorsBDNF protein, humanBrain-Derived Neurotrophic FactorHydrocortisoneInsulin-Like Growth Factor IBrain activityCognitionCortisolIsolationMoodNeurotrophic factors

Identifiers

PMID30927043
OpenAlexW2929833091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.