ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2019
Quantitative anatomy of the primary ossification center in the fetal pubis bone.
Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multiple Ossification Centers of the Pubic Bone as a Supportive Radiographic Feature forDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Recent advances in mucopolysaccharidosis IVA treatment.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Review
- MR imaging spectrum of adolescent pubic symphyseal injuries/athletic pubalgia.Pediatric radiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposesSkeletodysplasiae and hereditary dysostoses constitute a group of over 350 disorders of the skeletal system. Knowledge about development of the pubic primary ossification center may be useful in both determining the fetal stage and maturity, and for detecting congenital disorders. The present study was performed to quantitatively examine the pubic primary ossification center with respect to its linear, planar, and volumetric parameters. MATERIALS AND
methodsUsing methods of computed tomography (CT), digital-image analysis and statistics, the size of the pubic primary ossification center in 33 spontaneously aborted human fetuses (18 males and 15 females) aged 22-30 weeks was studied.
resultsWith no sex and laterality differences, the best-fit growth dynamics for the pubic primary ossification center was modeled by the following functions: y = - 13.694 + 0.728 × age ± 0.356 for its sagittal diameter, y = - 3.350 + 0.218 × age ± 0.159 for its vertical diameter, y = - 61.415 + 2.828 × age ± 1.519 for its projection surface area, and y = - 65.801 + 3.173 × age ± 2.149 for its volume.
conclusionsThe size of the pubic primary ossification center shows neither sex nor laterality differences. The growth dynamics of the vertical and sagittal diameters, projection surface area, and volume of the pubic ossification centers follow proportionately to fetal age. The obtained numerical findings of the pubic ossification center are considered age-specific reference data with clinical implications in the diagnostics of congenital defects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.