Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30926992›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of nutrition2019

Changes in Iron Status Are Related to Changes in Brain Activity and Behavior in Rwandan Female University Students: Results from a Randomized Controlled Efficacy Trial Involving Iron-Biofortified Beans.

Michael J Wenger, Stephanie E Rhoten, Laura E Murray-Kolb, Samuel P Scott, Erick Boy, Jean-Bosco Gahutu, Jere D Haas

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01594359 (Efficacy of Iron Biofortified Beans in Improving the Iron Status of Rwandan Adolescent Girls), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01594359 nacompletednot on this map

Efficacy of Iron Biofortified Beans in Improving the Iron Status of Rwandan Adolescent Girls: A Randomized Control Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSwiss Federal Institute of TechnologyRan2012 to 2014Enrolled300ConditionsIron DeficiencyArmsBiofortified beans, BEAN
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Iron Deficiency in Menstruating Adult Women: Much More than Anemia.Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michael J WengerDepartment of Psychology and Cellular and Behavioral Neurobiology, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK.
Stephanie E RhotenDepartment of Psychology and Cellular and Behavioral Neurobiology, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK.
Laura E Murray-KolbDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
Samuel P ScottDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
Erick BoyHarvestPlus, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC.
Jean-Bosco GahutuUniversity of Rwanda, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Huye, Rwanda.
Jere D HaasDivision of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence suggests that iron deficiency (ID) affects cognitive performance, as measured in behavior. Although such effects must be mediated by changes in the brain, very few studies have included measures of brain activity to assess this relation.

objectiveWe tested the hypothesis that provision of iron-biofortified beans would result in improvements in measures of iron status, brain dynamics, and behavior.

methodsA double-blind, randomized, intervention study was conducted in 55 women aged 18-27 y with low iron status (serum ferritin <20 µg/L). Women were randomly assigned to consume iron-biofortified (86.1 ppm iron) or comparison beans (50.1 ppm iron) daily for 18 wk. Iron status was assessed by hemoglobin, ferritin, transferrin receptor, and body iron; cognitive performance with 5 computerized tasks; and brain dynamics by concurrent electroencephalography (EEG). All measures were taken at baseline and endline.

resultsThe groups did not differ on any measures at baseline. Intention-to-treat analyses revealed significant (all P < 0.05) improvements in hemoglobin (partial effect size attributable to the independent variable, η2 = 0.16), ferritin (η2 = 0.17), and body iron (η2 = 0.10), speed of responding in attentional and mnemonic tasks (η2 = 0.04-0.29), sensitivity and efficiency of memory retrieval (η2 = 0.12-0.55), and measures of EEG amplitude and spectral power (η2 = 0.08 to 0.49). Mediation models provided evidence in support of the hypothesis that changes in iron status produce changes in behavior by way of changes in brain activity.

conclusionsBehavioral performance and brain activity, as measured by EEG, are sensitive to iron status, and the consumption of iron-biofortified beans for 18 wk resulted in improvements in measures of both, relative to what was obtained with a comparison bean, in a sample of female university students. Furthermore, the results support the conclusion that changes in brain activity resulting from consumption of biofortified beans mediate the relations between changes in iron biomarkers and changes in cognition. Clinical trial registry: ClinicalTrials.gov Reg No. NCT01594359.

Indexed as

FabaceaeFood, FortifiedAdolescentAdultBehaviorCognitionDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansIronRwandaYoung AdultIronbiofortificationbraincognitionironwomen of reproductive age

Identifiers

PMID30926992
PMCPMC6461719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.