Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30926947›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of obesity (2005)2019

Cost-effectiveness of community-based childhood obesity prevention interventions in Australia.

Jaithri Ananthapavan, Phuong K Nguyen, Steven J Bowe, Gary Sacks, Ana Maria Mantilla Herrera, Boyd Swinburn, Vicki Brown, Rohan Sweeney, Anita Lal, Claudia Strugnell and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of obesity (2005), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. A systematic review of economic evidence for community-based obesity prevention interventions in children.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2023
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Framework for developing cost-effectiveness analysis threshold: the case of Egypt.The Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jaithri AnanthapavanDeakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia. jaithri.ananthapavan@deakin.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5957-6931
Phuong K NguyenDeakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Steven J BoweDeakin Biostatistics Unit, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Gary SacksGlobal Obesity Centre (GLOBE), Institute for Health Transformation, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Ana Maria Mantilla HerreraSchool of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Boyd SwinburnGlobal Obesity Centre (GLOBE), Institute for Health Transformation, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Vicki BrownDeakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Rohan SweeneyDeakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Anita LalDeakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Claudia StrugnellGlobal Obesity Centre (GLOBE), Institute for Health Transformation, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Marj MoodieDeakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Deakin University · AUThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe objective of this study is to examine, from a limited societal perspective, the cost-effectiveness of community-based obesity prevention interventions (CBIs)-defined as a programme of community-level strategies to promote healthy eating and physical activity for Australian children (aged 5-18 years).

methodsThe effectiveness of CBIs was determined by undertaking a literature review and meta-analysis. Commonly implemented strategies to increase physical activity and improve nutrition were costed (in 2010 Australian dollars) to determine the average cost of a generic programme. A multiple cohort Markov model that simulates diseases associated with overweight and obesity was used to estimate the health benefits, measured as health-adjusted life years (HALYs) and healthcare-related cost offsets from diseases averted due to exposure to the intervention. Health and cost outcomes were estimated over the lifetime of the target population. Monte-Carlo simulation was used to assess second-order uncertainty of input parameters to estimate mean incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) with 95% uncertainty intervals (UIs). Scenario analyses tested variations in programme intensity, target population, and duration of effect.

resultsThe meta-analysis revealed a small but significant difference in BMI z-score (mean difference of - 0.07 (95% UI: - 0.13 to - 0.01)) favouring the CBI community compared with the control. The estimated net cost of implementing CBIs across all local government areas (LGAs) in Australia was AUD426M (95% UI: AUD3M to AUD823M) over 3 years. This resulted in 51,792 HALYs gained (95% UI: 6816 to 96,972) over the lifetime of the cohort. The mean ICER was AUD8155 per HALY gained (95% UI: AUD237 to AUD81,021), with a 95% probability of being cost-effective at a willingness to pay threshold of AUD50,000 per HALY.

conclusionsCBIs are cost-effective obesity prevention initiatives; however, implementation across Australia will be (relatively) expensive when compared with current investments in preventive health.

Indexed as

AdolescentAustraliaChildCommunity Health ServicesCost-Benefit AnalysisDiet, HealthyExerciseFemaleHealth PromotionHumansMalePediatric ObesityPrimary Prevention

Identifiers

PMID30926947
OpenAlexW2935588480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.