Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30926674›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2019

Clinically Integrated Molecular Diagnostics in Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma.

Julia Thierauf, Nisha Ramamurthy, Vickie Y Jo, Hayley Robinson, Ryan P Frazier, Jonathan Gonzalez, Maciej Pacula, Enrique Dominguez Meneses, Vania Nose, Valentina Nardi and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Slide-to-Slide Tissue Transfer and Array Assembly From Limited Samples for Comprehensive Molecular Profiling.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2023
    Article
  16. Diagnostic Value of MAML2 Rearrangements in Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Julia ThieraufDepartment of Pathology, Center for Integrated Diagnostics, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Nisha RamamurthyDepartment of Pathology, Center for Integrated Diagnostics, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Vickie Y JoDepartment of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Hayley RobinsonDepartment of Pathology, Center for Integrated Diagnostics, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Ryan P FrazierDepartment of Pathology, Center for Integrated Diagnostics, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Jonathan GonzalezDepartment of Pathology, Center for Integrated Diagnostics, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Maciej PaculaDepartment of Pathology, Computational Pathology, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Enrique Dominguez MenesesDepartment of Pathology, Computational Pathology, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Vania NoseDepartment of Pathology, Head and Neck Pathology, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Valentina NardiDepartment of Pathology, Center for Integrated Diagnostics, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Dora Dias-SantagataDepartment of Pathology, Center for Integrated Diagnostics, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Long P LeDepartment of Pathology, Center for Integrated Diagnostics, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Derrick T LinDepartment of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
William C FaquinDepartment of Pathology, Surgical Pathology, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Lori J WirthCancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Jochen HessDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
A John IafrateDepartment of Pathology, Center for Integrated Diagnostics, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Jochen K LennerzDepartment of Pathology, Center for Integrated Diagnostics, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA jlennerz@partners.org.
Harvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USComputational Physics (United States) · USMassachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USGerman Cancer Research Center · DE

Funding

Strategies to Overcome Immune Resistance in Head and Neck CancersP01CA240239 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI PAI, SARA ISABEL · 2019 to 2023
$8.4M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA240239
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) is an aggressive salivary gland malignancy without effective systemic therapies. Delineation of molecular profiles in ACC has led to an increased number of biomarker-stratified clinical trials; however, the clinical utility and U.S.-centric financial sustainability of integrated next-generation sequencing (NGS) in routine practice has, to our knowledge, not been assessed. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn our practice, NGS genotyping was implemented at the discretion of the primary clinician. We combined NGS-based mutation and fusion detection, with MYB break-apart fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and MYB immunohistochemistry. Utility was defined as the fraction of patients with tumors harboring alterations that are potentially amenable to targeted therapies. Financial sustainability was assessed using the fraction of global reimbursement.

resultsAmong 181 consecutive ACC cases (2011-2018), prospective genotyping was performed in 11% (

conclusionProspective routine clinical genotyping in ACC can identify clinically relevant subsets of patients and is approaching financial sustainability. Demonstrating clinical utility and financial sustainability in an orphan disease (ACC) requires a multiyear and multidimensional program. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Delineation of molecular profiles in adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) has been accomplished in the research setting; however, the ability to identify relevant patient subsets in clinical practice has not been assessed. This work presents an approach to perform integrated molecular genotyping of patients with ACC with nonresectable, recurrent, or systemic disease. It was determined that 75% of nonresectable patients harbor potentially actionable alterations and that 63% of charges are reimbursed. This report outlines that orphan diseases such as ACC require a multiyear, multidimensional program to demonstrate utility in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Adenoid CysticFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMaleMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesAdenoid cystic carcinomaMolecular diagnosticsMYBNOTCH1Salivary glands

Identifiers

PMID30926674
PMCPMC6795155
OpenAlexW2935105545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.