ArticleEBioMedicine2019
Enhanced wound healing promotion by immune response-free monkey autologous iPSCs and exosomes vs. their allogeneic counterparts.
Article in EBioMedicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
51 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Exosome and its Application in Skin Wound Healing: A Systematic Review onCurrent pharmaceutical biotechnology · 2025Pooled it
- Meta-analysis study of small extracellular vesicle nursing application therapies for healing of wounds and skin regeneration.Archives of dermatological research · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of small extracellular vesicle interventions in wound healing and skin regeneration: A systematic review and meta-analysis of animal studies.Theranostics · 2022Pooled it
- Review
- Therapeutic potential of stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles in aging and regeneration.Frontiers in aging · 2026Review
- Extracellular vesicles in chronic wound therapy: engineering strategies and advanced delivery systems for enhanced regeneration.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Progress in exosome-related research supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China.Fundamental research · 2025Review
- Stem cell derived exosome trilogy: an epic comparison of human MSCs, ESCs and iPSCs.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Review
- Precision exosome engineering for enhanced wound healing and scar revision.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Proteomic Profiling of Donkey Milk Exosomes Highlights Bioactive Proteins with Immune-Related Functions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Review
- Mapping the Landscape of Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles: From Bench to Bedside.Stem cells international · 2025Article
- The Potential Application of Exosomes as Therapeutic Agents, Carriers, and Biomarkers in Skin Diseases.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
- Exosomes: the future of acellular nanotherapeutics in regenerative vascularization.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Extracellular vesicles in burn injury: roles, mechanisms, and applications.Burns & trauma · 2025Review
- Engineered extracellular vesicles derived from pluripotent stem cells: a cell-free approach to regenerative medicine.Burns & trauma · 2025Review
- Extracellular vesicles: innovative cell-free solutions for wound repair.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Exosome-mediated renal protection: Halting the progression of fibrosis.Genes & diseases · 2024Review
- Mesenchymal stromal/stem cell tissue source and in vitro expansion impact extracellular vesicle protein and miRNA compositions as well as angiogenic and immunomodulatory capacities.Journal of extracellular vesicles · 2024Article
- Xenogeneic Transplantation Promoted Human Exosome Sequestration in Rat Specific Organs.Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundComparing non-inbred autologous and allogeneic induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and their secreted subcellular products among non-human primates is critical for choosing optimal iPSC products for human clinical trials.
methodsiPSCs were induced from skin fibroblastic cells of adult male rhesus macaques belonging to four unrelated consanguineous families. Teratoma generativity, host immune response, and skin wound healing promotion were evaluated subsequently.
findingsAll autologous, but no allogeneic, iPSCs formed teratomas, whereas all allogeneic, but no autologous, iPSCs caused lymphocyte infiltration. Macrophages were not detectable in any wound. iPSCs expressed significantly more MAMU A and E of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I but not more other MHC genetic alleles than parental fibroblastic cells. All topically disseminated autologous and allogeneic iPSCs, and their exosomes accelerated skin wound healing, as demonstrated by wound closure, epithelial coverage, collagen deposition, and angiogenesis. Allogeneic iPSCs and their exosomes were less effective and viable than their autologous counterparts. Some iPSCs differentiated into new endothelial cells and all iPSCs lost their pluripotency in 14 days. Exosomes increased cell viability of injured epidermal, endothelial, and fibroblastic cells in vitro. Although exosomes contained some mRNAs of pluripotent factors, they did not impart pluripotency to host cells.
interpretationAlthough all of the autologous and allogeneic iPSCs and exosomes accelerated wound healing, allogeneic iPSC exosomes were the preferred choice for "off-the shelf" iPSC products, owing to their mass-production, with no concern of teratoma formation. FUND: National Natural Science Foundation of China and National Key R&D Program of China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.