ArticleUrology2019
The Utility of Prostate Specific Antigen Density, Prostate Health Index, and Prostate Health Index Density in Predicting Positive Prostate Biopsy Outcome is Dependent on the Prostate Biopsy Methods.
Article in Urology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Volume-adjusted p2PSA-derived indices for predicting prostate cancer: the PROPHET study.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Observational
- Tissue immunostaining of candidate prognostic proteins in metastatic and non-metastatic prostate cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- PHI density prospectively improves prostate cancer detection.World journal of urology · 2021Article
- Biomarker discrimination and calibration with MRI-targeted biopsies: an analysis with the Stockholm3 test.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2021Article
- Optimized Identification of High-Grade Prostate Cancer by Combining Different PSA Molecular Forms and PSA Density in a Deep Learning Model.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Prostate Health Index Density Outperforms Prostate Health Index in Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Circulating miRNAs as Potential Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy.Cancer management and research · 2021Article
- Correlation between Gleason score distribution and Prostate Health Index in patients with prostate-specific antigen values of 2.5-10 ng/mL.Investigative and clinical urology · 2020Article
- Prostate volume does not provide additional predictive value to prostate health index for prostate cancer or clinically significant prostate cancer: results from a multicenter study in China.Asian journal of andrologyObservational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate prognostic markers, prostate-specific antigen, prostate health index (PHI), and prostate volume indexed measures (prostate-specific antigen density and prostate health index density) for predicting positive prostate cancer biopsies in magnetic resonance (MR) transrectal ultrasound fused versus nonfused transrectal ultrasonography biopsy.
methodsA retrospective cohort of 211 patients that had at least 1 suspected MR lesion, Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System ≥3, and subsequent biopsy (2015-2017). Clinical characteristics and prognostic biomarkers were evaluated as predictors of prostate cancer detection by type of biopsy guidance (fused vs nonfused).
resultsOne-hundred twenty-one patients had nonfused and 90 had fused biopsies. PHI and PHID had greater area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) in predicting positive biopsies than prostate-specific antigen or PSAD for both nonfused and fused biopsy. PHI 0.78 (95% CI 0.67-0.88) and PHID 0.82 (95% CI 0.73-0.91) had the greatest AUC for predicting biopsy results for nonfused and fused biopsies, respectively. Multiple-variable models did not improve model fit compared to single variables. Based on Youden's index, a cut-off value of 45.9 for PHI in nonfused and 0.64 for PHID in fused biopsies would reduce the number of negative biopsies by 77.3% and 63.4%, respectively, but the percentage of missed clinically significant cancer biopsies would be 19% and 12%, respectively.
conclusionOur findings demonstrate that the choice of prognostic biomarkers for predicting positive biopsies is a function of the biopsy guidance method. Volume indexed derivatives appear to have greater value when a MRI-US fused method is used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.