Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30926382›Full record

ArticleUrology2019

The Utility of Prostate Specific Antigen Density, Prostate Health Index, and Prostate Health Index Density in Predicting Positive Prostate Biopsy Outcome is Dependent on the Prostate Biopsy Methods.

Camila Lopes Vendrami, Robert J McCarthy, Argha Chatterjee, David Casalino, Edward M Schaeffer, William J Catalona, Frank H Miller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Urology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Camila Lopes VendramiDepartment of Radiology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Robert J McCarthyDepartment of Anesthesiology, Rush University, Chicago, IL.
Argha ChatterjeeDepartment of Radiology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
David CasalinoDepartment of Radiology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Edward M SchaefferDepartment of Urology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
William J CatalonaDepartment of Urology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Frank H MillerDepartment of Radiology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL. Electronic address: fmiller@northwestern.edu.

Funding

Targeting FOXA1-downstream pathways: a novel therapeutic strategy for castration-resistant prostate cancerP50CA180995 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI ABDULKADIR, SARKI A., HUSSAIN, MAHA H · 2015 to 2025
$19.9M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA180995
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate prognostic markers, prostate-specific antigen, prostate health index (PHI), and prostate volume indexed measures (prostate-specific antigen density and prostate health index density) for predicting positive prostate cancer biopsies in magnetic resonance (MR) transrectal ultrasound fused versus nonfused transrectal ultrasonography biopsy.

methodsA retrospective cohort of 211 patients that had at least 1 suspected MR lesion, Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System ≥3, and subsequent biopsy (2015-2017). Clinical characteristics and prognostic biomarkers were evaluated as predictors of prostate cancer detection by type of biopsy guidance (fused vs nonfused).

resultsOne-hundred twenty-one patients had nonfused and 90 had fused biopsies. PHI and PHID had greater area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) in predicting positive biopsies than prostate-specific antigen or PSAD for both nonfused and fused biopsy. PHI 0.78 (95% CI 0.67-0.88) and PHID 0.82 (95% CI 0.73-0.91) had the greatest AUC for predicting biopsy results for nonfused and fused biopsies, respectively. Multiple-variable models did not improve model fit compared to single variables. Based on Youden's index, a cut-off value of 45.9 for PHI in nonfused and 0.64 for PHID in fused biopsies would reduce the number of negative biopsies by 77.3% and 63.4%, respectively, but the percentage of missed clinically significant cancer biopsies would be 19% and 12%, respectively.

conclusionOur findings demonstrate that the choice of prognostic biomarkers for predicting positive biopsies is a function of the biopsy guidance method. Volume indexed derivatives appear to have greater value when a MRI-US fused method is used.

Indexed as

AgedEndosonographyFollow-Up StudiesHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPredictive Value of TestsProstateProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsRectumRetrospective StudiesROC CurveProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID30926382
PMCPMC6592745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.