Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30926024›Full record

ReviewCardiology clinics2019

Should His Bundle Pacing Be Preferred over Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Following Atrioventricular Junction Ablation?

Zak Loring, Albert Y Sun

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiology clinics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zak LoringDivision of Cardiology, Section of Electrophysiology, Duke University Medical Center, 2301 Erwin Road, Durham, NC 27710, USA; Duke Clinical Research Institute, 200 Morris St, Durham, NC 27701, USA. Electronic address: zak.loring@duke.edu.
Albert Y SunDivision of Cardiology, Section of Electrophysiology, Duke University Medical Center, 2301 Erwin Road, Durham, NC 27710, USA; Division of Cardiology, Section of Electrophysiology, Durham VA Medical Center, 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC 27705, USA.
Clinical Research Institute · USDurham VA Medical Center · US

Funding

Postdoctoral Training in Cardiovascular Clinical ResearchT32HL069749 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MARK, DANIEL B · 2003 to 2023
$6.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL069749
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) are associated with high morbidity and mortality, which is particularly detrimental when patients develop rapid ventricular rates (RVR). Atrioventricular junction (AVJ) ablation with pacemaker implantation has been used as a method of achieving rate control in patients with incessant AF with RVR. Right ventricular only pacing is known to be harmful in the setting of HF. His bundle pacing (HBP) and biventricular (BiV) pacing both offer durable pacing solutions that offer more physiologic activation. This review describes the benefits and drawbacks of HBP and BiV pacing in HF patients after AVJ ablation.

Indexed as

Catheter AblationAtrial FibrillationAtrioventricular NodeBundle of HisCardiac Pacing, ArtificialCardiac Resynchronization TherapyComorbidityGlobal HealthHeart FailureHeart RateHumansStroke VolumeTreatment OutcomeAtrial fibrillationBiventricular pacemakerCardiac resynchronization therapyCatheter ablationHeart failureHis bundle pacing

Identifiers

PMID30926024
PMCPMC6442941
OpenAlexW2911746657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.