ReviewCardiology clinics2019
Imaging for Risk Stratification in Atrial Fibrillation with Heart Failure.
Review in Cardiology clinics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Discordance between left atrial pressure and risk scores in assessment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025Article
- The left atrium in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: What we know and what we do not know.Heart rhythm O2 · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac rhythm disorder and is associated with heart failure (HF). Cardiac imaging modalities play an important role in risk assessment and managing AF. This article reviews the use of cardiac imaging for risk assessment and to optimize treatment strategy in patients with AF and HF. First, the clinical role of echocardiography, computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance for risk stratification is provided. Second, the value of imaging in catheter ablation is reviewed, including preoperative assessment, optimizing patient selection for ablation, use during the ablation procedure, and postoperative scar assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.