Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30925894›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2019

A statistical normalization method and differential expression analysis for RNA-seq data between different species.

Yan Zhou, Jiadi Zhu, Tiejun Tong, Junhui Wang, Bingqing Lin, Jun Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Genes · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yan ZhouCollege of Mathematics and Statistics, Institute of Statistical Sciences, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, China.
Jiadi ZhuCollege of Mathematics and Statistics, Institute of Statistical Sciences, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, China.
Tiejun TongDepartment of Mathematics, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong.
Junhui WangSchool of Data Science, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong.
Bingqing LinCollege of Mathematics and Statistics, Institute of Statistical Sciences, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, China.
Jun ZhangCollege of Mathematics and Statistics, Institute of Statistical Sciences, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, China. zhangjunstat@gmail.com.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 11701385the Doctor Start Fund of Guangdong Province 2016A030310062the Health and Medical Research Fund 04150476the National Natural Science Foundation of China 11671338the National Natural Science Foundation of China 11701386the National Statistical Research Project 2017LY56
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh-throughput techniques bring novel tools and also statistical challenges to genomic research. Identifying genes with differential expression between different species is an effective way to discover evolutionarily conserved transcriptional responses. To remove systematic variation between different species for a fair comparison, normalization serves as a crucial pre-processing step that adjusts for the varying sample sequencing depths and other confounding technical effects.

resultsIn this paper, we propose a scale based normalization (SCBN) method by taking into account the available knowledge of conserved orthologous genes and by using the hypothesis testing framework. Considering the different gene lengths and unmapped genes between different species, we formulate the problem from the perspective of hypothesis testing and search for the optimal scaling factor that minimizes the deviation between the empirical and nominal type I errors.

conclusionsSimulation studies show that the proposed method performs significantly better than the existing competitor in a wide range of settings. An RNA-seq dataset of different species is also analyzed and it coincides with the conclusion that the proposed method outperforms the existing method. For practical applications, we have also developed an R package named "SCBN", which is freely available at http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/devel/bioc/html/SCBN.html .

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingStatistics as TopicAnimalsComputer SimulationHumansMiceSequence Analysis, RNASpecies SpecificityDifferential expressionHypothesis testNormalizationOrthologous genesRNA-seq

Identifiers

PMID30925894
PMCPMC6441199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.