ReviewGenome medicine2019
Translating insights into tumor evolution to clinical practice: promises and challenges.
Review in Genome medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Guideline
- An enhanced genetic model of relapsed IGH-translocated multiple myeloma evolutionary dynamics.Blood cancer journal · 2020Trial
- A guide to understanding tumour evolution through the lens of population genetics.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2026Review
- Tumor evolution: signaling pathways, molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- The Evolutionary Forest of Pancreatic Cancer.Cancer discovery · 2025Article
- Advancing Veterinary Oncology: Next-Generation Diagnostics for Early Cancer Detection and Clinical Implementation.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
- Cancer phylogenetic inference using copy number alterations detected from DNA sequencing data.Cancer pathogenesis and therapy · 2025Review
- Progress of single-cell sequencing technology in immunotherapy for tuberculosis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
- CaClust: linking genotype to transcriptional heterogeneity of follicular lymphoma using BCR and exomic variants.Genome biology · 2024Article
- Blending space and time to talk about cancer in extended reality.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Review
- Genetic variation drives cancer cell adaptation to ECM stiffness.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Inference of chromosome selection parameters and missegregation rate in cancer from DNA-sequencing data.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- GWAS advancements to investigate disease associations and biological mechanisms.Clinical and translational discovery · 2024Article
- Frequency-dependent selection of neoantigens fosters tumor immune escape and predicts immunotherapy response.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Cetuximab chemotherapy resistance: Insight into the homeostatic evolution of head and neck cancer (Review).Oncology reports · 2024Review
- The molecular map of CLL and Richter's syndrome.Seminars in hematology · 2024Review
- ConDoR: tumor phylogeny inference with a copy-number constrained mutation loss model.Genome biology · 2023Article
- Article
- Growth exponents reflect evolutionary processes and treatment response in brain metastases.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2023Article
- A weighted distance-based approach for deriving consensus tumor evolutionary trees.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accelerating technological advances have allowed the widespread genomic profiling of tumors. As yet, however, the vast catalogues of mutations that have been identified have made only a modest impact on clinical medicine. Massively parallel sequencing has informed our understanding of the genetic evolution and heterogeneity of cancers, allowing us to place these mutational catalogues into a meaningful context. Here, we review the methods used to measure tumor evolution and heterogeneity, and the potential and challenges for translating the insights gained to achieve clinical impact for cancer therapy, monitoring, early detection, risk stratification, and prevention. We discuss how tumor evolution can guide cancer therapy by targeting clonal and subclonal mutations both individually and in combination. Circulating tumor DNA and circulating tumor cells can be leveraged for monitoring the efficacy of therapy and for tracking the emergence of resistant subclones. The evolutionary history of tumors can be deduced for late-stage cancers, either directly by sampling precursor lesions or by leveraging computational approaches to infer the timing of driver events. This approach can identify recurrent early driver mutations that represent promising avenues for future early detection strategies. Emerging evidence suggests that mutational processes and complex clonal dynamics are active even in normal development and aging. This will make discriminating developing malignant neoplasms from normal aging cell lineages a challenge. Furthermore, insight into signatures of mutational processes that are active early in tumor evolution may allow the development of cancer-prevention approaches. Research and clinical studies that incorporate an appreciation of the complex evolutionary patterns in tumors will not only produce more meaningful genomic data, but also better exploit the vulnerabilities of cancer, resulting in improved treatment outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.