ArticleBMC bioinformatics2019
Constructing effective energy functions for protein structure prediction through broadening attraction-basin and reverse Monte Carlo sampling.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Protein Structure Prediction: Challenges, Advances, and the Shift of Research Paradigms.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe ab initio approaches to protein structure prediction usually employ the Monte Carlo technique to search the structural conformation that has the lowest energy. However, the widely-used energy functions are usually ineffective for conformation search. How to construct an effective energy function remains a challenging task.
resultsHere, we present a framework to construct effective energy functions for protein structure prediction. Unlike existing energy functions only requiring the native structure to be the lowest one, we attempt to maximize the attraction-basin where the native structure lies in the energy landscape. The underlying rationale is that each energy function determines a specific energy landscape together with a native attraction-basin, and the larger the attraction-basin is, the more likely for the Monte Carlo search procedure to find the native structure. Following this rationale, we constructed effective energy functions as follows: i) To explore the native attraction-basin determined by a certain energy function, we performed reverse Monte Carlo sampling starting from the native structure, identifying the structural conformations on the edge of attraction-basin. ii) To broaden the native attraction-basin, we smoothened the edge points of attraction-basin through tuning weights of energy terms, thus acquiring an improved energy function. Our framework alternates the broadening attraction-basin and reverse sampling steps (thus called BARS) until the native attraction-basin is sufficiently large. We present extensive experimental results to show that using the BARS framework, the constructed energy functions could greatly facilitate protein structure prediction in improving the quality of predicted structures and speeding up conformation search.
conclusionUsing the BARS framework, we constructed effective energy functions for protein structure prediction, which could improve the quality of predicted structures and speed up conformation search as well.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.