Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30925741›Full record

ReviewBrain sciences2019

Found in Translation: The Utility of

Anthony L Gaeta, Kim A Caldwell, Guy A Caldwell

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Unraveling Molecular Targets for Neurodegenerative Diseases ThroughInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. A Brief Review on Caenorhabditis elegans Role in Modelling Neurodegenerative Disease.Central nervous system agents in medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Use ofBiomolecules · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Attenuation of Dopaminergic Neurodegeneration in aJournal of developmental biology · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Integrated regulation of dopaminergic and epigenetic effectors of neuroprotection in Parkinson's disease models.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anthony L GaetaDepartment of Biological Sciences, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA. algaeta@crimson.ua.edu.
Kim A CaldwellDepartment of Biological Sciences, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA. kcaldwel@ua.edu.
Guy A CaldwellDepartment of Biological Sciences, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA. gcaldwel@ua.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8283-9090
University of Alabama · US

Funding

MECHANISMS AND MODULATORS OF RESILIENCE TO DOPAMINERGIC NEURODEGENERATIONR15NS104857 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA IN TUSCALOOSA · PI CALDWELL, GUY A · 2018 to 2018
$422k
National Institutes of Health R15 NS104857-01A1NINDS NIH HHS R15 NS104857
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parkinson's Disease (PD) is the second-most common neurodegenerative disease in the world, yet the fundamental and underlying causes of the disease are largely unknown, and treatments remain sparse and impotent. Several biological systems have been employed to model the disease but the nematode roundworm

Indexed as

alpha-synucleinC. elegansdopamineneurodegenerationParkinson

Identifiers

PMID30925741
PMCPMC6523935
OpenAlexW2923261638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.