Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30925727›Full record

ArticleNutrients2019

Palatability of Goat's versus Cow's Milk: Insights from the Analysis of Eating Behavior and Gene Expression in the Appetite-Relevant Brain Circuit in Laboratory Animal Models.

Anica Klockars, Erin L Wood, Sarah N Gartner, Laura K McColl, Allen S Levine, Elizabeth A Carpenter, Colin G Prosser, Pawel K Olszewski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Anica KlockarsFaculty of Science and Engineering, University of Waikato, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand. anica.klockars@waikato.ac.nz.
Erin L WoodFaculty of Science and Engineering, University of Waikato, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand. elw14@students.waikato.ac.nz.
Sarah N GartnerFaculty of Science and Engineering, University of Waikato, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand. snm10@students.waikato.ac.nz.
Laura K McCollFaculty of Science and Engineering, University of Waikato, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand. laura.mccoll@waikato.ac.nz.
Allen S LevineDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55113, USA. aslevine@umn.edu.
Elizabeth A CarpenterDairy Goat Cooperative (NZ) Ltd., Hamilton 3206, New Zealand. Liz.Carpenter@dgc.co.nz.ORCID 0000-0002-3056-3336
Colin G ProsserDairy Goat Cooperative (NZ) Ltd., Hamilton 3206, New Zealand. Colin.Prosser@dgc.co.nz.
Pawel K OlszewskiFaculty of Science and Engineering, University of Waikato, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand. pawel@waikato.ac.nz.
University of Waikato · NZDairyNZ · NZUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Callaghan Innovation 106376
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Goat's (GM) and cow's milk (CM) are dietary alternatives with select health benefits shown in human and animal studies. Surprisingly, no systematic analysis of palatability or preference for GM vs. CM has been performed to date. Here, we present a comprehensive investigation of short-term intake and palatability profiles of GM and CM in laboratory mice and rats. We studied consumption in no-choice and choice scenarios, including meal microstructure, and by using isocaloric milks and milk-enriched solid diets. Feeding results are accompanied by qPCR data of relevant genes in the energy balance-related hypothalamus and brain stem, and in the nucleus accumbens, which regulates eating for palatability. We found that GM and CM are palatable to juvenile, adult, and aged rodents. Given a choice, animals prefer GM- to CM-based diets. Analysis of meal microstructure using licking patterns points to enhanced palatability of and, possibly, greater motivation toward GM over CM. Most profound changes in gene expression after GM vs. CM were associated with the brain systems driving consumption for reward. We conclude that, while both GM and CM are palatable, GM is preferred over CM by laboratory animals, and this preference is driven by central mechanisms controlling eating for pleasure.

Indexed as

CattleFeeding BehaviorGoatsMilkAgingAnimalsBrainGene Expression RegulationMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySpecies SpecificityTasteappetitehypothalamusmilknucleus accumbenspalatabilityreward

Identifiers

PMID30925727
PMCPMC6520687
OpenAlexW2924045943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.