Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30925400›Full record

ArticleBiomaterials2019

Electrodeposited platinum-iridium coating improves in vivo recording performance of chronically implanted microelectrode arrays.

Isaac R Cassar, Chunxiu Yu, Jaydeep Sambangi, Curtis D Lee, John J Whalen, Artin Petrossians, Warren M Grill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomaterials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Data · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Isaac R CassarDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, Duke University, NC, USA.
Chunxiu YuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, Duke University, NC, USA; Department of Biological Science, Michigan Technological University, MI, USA.
Jaydeep SambangiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, Duke University, NC, USA.
Curtis D LeePlatinum Group Coatings, LLC. Pasadena, CA, USA.
John J WhalenPlatinum Group Coatings, LLC. Pasadena, CA, USA.
Artin PetrossiansPlatinum Group Coatings, LLC. Pasadena, CA, USA.
Warren M GrillDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, Duke University, NC, USA; Department of Neurobiology, School of Medicine, NC, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, NC, USA; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, School of Engineering, Duke University, NC, USA. Electronic address: warren.grill@duke.edu.

Funding

Temporal Patterns of Deep Brain StimulationR37NS040894 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI GRILL, WARREN M. · 2015 to 2021
$4.2M
Improved Electrode Material for Deep Brain Stimulation and Neural RecordingR44NS083183 · NINDS · PLATINUM GROUP COATINGS, LLC · PI PETROSSIANS, ARTIN · 2015 to 2016
$1.3M
NINDS NIH HHS R37 NS040894NINDS NIH HHS R44 NS083183
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reliable single unit neuron recordings from chronically implanted microelectrode arrays (MEAs) are essential tools in the field of neural engineering. However, following implantation, MEAs undergo a foreign body response that functionally isolates them from the brain and reduces the useful longevity of the array. We tested a novel electrodeposited platinum-iridium coating (EPIC) on penetrating recording MEAs to determine if it improved recording performance. We chronically implanted the arrays in rats and used electrophysiological and histological measurements to compare quantitatively the single unit recording performance of coated vs. uncoated electrodes over a 12-week period. The coated electrodes had substantially lower impedance at 1 kHz and reduced noise, increased signal-to-noise ratio, and increased number of discernible units per electrode as compared to uncoated electrodes. Post-mortem immunohistochemistry showed no significant differences in the immune response between coated and uncoated electrodes. Overall, the EPIC arrays provided superior recording performance than uncoated arrays, likely due to lower electrode impedance and reduced noise.

Indexed as

Electrodes, ImplantedElectroplatingAnimalsCoated Materials, BiocompatibleElectric ImpedanceFemaleIridiumMicroelectrodesPlatinumRats, Sprague-DawleyCoated Materials, BiocompatibleIridiumPlatinumElectrodeposited platinum iridiumElectrode surface modificationForeign body responseNeural interfaceNeural recordingRats

Identifiers

PMID30925400
PMCPMC6472919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.