Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30924788›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2019

Reducing Retail Merchandising of Discretionary Food and Beverages in Remote Indigenous Community Stores: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Julie Brimblecombe, Megan Ferguson, Emma McMahon, Anna Peeters, Edward Miles, Thomas Wycherley, Leia M Minaker, Khia De Silva, Luke Greenacre, Catherine Mah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Peas in a Pod: The Process of Mutual Learning in Knowledge Exchange on Health Promotion Interventions Research.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Julie BrimblecombeDepartment of Nutrition, Dietetics and Food, Monash University, Notting Hill, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1977-276X
Megan FergusonMenzies School of Health Research, Darwin, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4435-0948
Emma McMahonMenzies School of Health Research, Darwin, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5790-4631
Anna PeetersDeakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4340-9132
Edward MilesMenzies School of Health Research, Darwin, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1064-2352
Thomas WycherleyMenzies School of Health Research, Darwin, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3096-1796
Leia M MinakerSchool of Planning, Faculty of Environment, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7751-2202
Khia De SilvaArnhem Land Progress Aboriginal Corporation, Darwin, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2299-4344
Luke GreenacreDepartment of Marketing, Monash University, Caulfield, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6029-6523
Catherine MahDalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7294-2035

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiscretionary food and beverages (products high in saturated fat, added sugars, and salt) are detrimental to a healthy diet. Nevertheless, they provide 42% of total energy and account for 53% of food and beverage expenditure for remote living Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians, contributing to the excessive burden of chronic diseases experienced by this population group.

objectiveThe aim of this study is to test an intervention to reduce sales of discretionary products, in collaboration with the Arnhem Land Progress Aboriginal Corporation (ALPA), which operates 25 stores in very remote Australia, by reducing their merchandising and substituting with core products in remote Australian communities.

methodsWe will use a community-level randomized controlled pragmatic trial design. Stores randomized to the intervention group will be supported by ALPA to reduce merchandising of 4 food categories (sugar, sugar-sweetened beverages, sweet biscuits, and confectionery) that together provide 64% of energy from discretionary foods and 87% of total free sugars in very remote community stores. The remaining stores (50% of total) will serve as controls and conduct business as usual. Electronic store sales data will be collected at baseline, 12-weeks intervention, and 24-weeks postintervention to objectively assess the primary outcome of percent change in purchases of free sugars (g/megajoule) and secondary business- and diet-related outcomes. Critical to ensuring translation to improved store policies and healthier diets in remote Indigenous Australia, we will conduct (1) an in-depth implementation evaluation to assess fidelity, (2) a customer intercept survey to investigate the relationship between customer characteristics and discretionary food purchasing, and (3) a qualitative study to identify policy supports for scale-up of health-enabling policy action in stores.

resultsAs of August 2018, 20 stores consented to participate and were randomized to receive the intervention or continue usual business. The 12-week strategy ended in December 2018. The 24-week postintervention follow-up will occur in May 2019. Trial results are expected for 2019.

conclusionsNovel pragmatic research approaches are needed to inform policy for healthy retail food environments. This research will greatly advance our understanding of how the retail food environment can be used to improve population-level diet in the remote Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander context and retail settings globally.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12618001588280; http://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=375933 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/76dbQEmwN). INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/12646.

Indexed as

dietfood supplyindigenous populationrandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID30924788
PMCPMC6538313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.