Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30924737›Full record

Observational studyJournal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners2019

Lanreotide vs octreotide LAR for patients with advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: An observational time and motion analysis.

P Ryan, A McBride, D Ray, S Pulgar, R A Ramirez, E Elquza, J P Favaro, G Dranitsaris

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03017690 (Lanreotide and Octreotide LAR for Patients With Advanced Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03017690 completednot on this map

Lanreotide and Octreotide LAR for Patients With Advanced Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (GEP-NETs): An Observational Time and Motion Analysis

TypeobservationalSponsorIpsenRan2017 to 2018Enrolled22ConditionsGastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Long-term clinical outcomes of [Frontiers in oncology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms: A review.World journal of clinical cases · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

P Ryan1 Ochsner Medical Center, Kenner, LA, USA.
A McBride2 University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ, USA.
D Ray3 Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., Basking Ridge, NJ, USA.
S Pulgar3 Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., Basking Ridge, NJ, USA.
R A Ramirez1 Ochsner Medical Center, Kenner, LA, USA.
E Elquza2 University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ, USA.
J P Favaro4 Oncology Specialists of Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, USA.
G Dranitsaris5 Augmentium Pharma Consulting Inc., Toronto, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1637-3122
Ipsen (United States) · USOchsner Medical Center · USUniversity of Arizona · USAugmentium Pharma Consulting (Canada) · CAOncology Specialists of Charlotte · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLanreotide and octreotide acetate suspension for injectable (LAR) are both recommended for clinical use in patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. However, each agent possesses unique attributes in terms of their drug-delivery characteristics. The study objective was to compare overall drug-delivery efficiency between lanreotide and octreotide LAR in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor patients.

methodsThis study employed an observational time and motion design among patients treated with lanreotide or octreotide LAR across five US cancer centers. Baseline patient data collection included age, disease grade and duration, prior therapies and performance status. Drug-delivery time (drug preparation and administration), total patient time and resource use data were collected for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors receiving lanreotide (n = 22) or octreotide LAR (n = 22). Following each administration, qualitative data on the drug-delivery experience was collected from patients and nurses.

resultsLanreotide was associated with a significant reduction in mean delivery time (2.5 min; 95% CI:2.0 to 3.1) compared to octreotide LAR (6.2 min; 95%CI: 4.4 to 7.9;

conclusionsLanreotide was associated with significant reductions in drug-delivery time compared to octreotide LAR, which contributed to an improvement in overall healthcare efficiency.

trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03017690.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsAttitude of Health PersonnelDrug CompoundingEquipment FailureFemaleHealth ResourcesHumansInjectionsIntestinal NeoplasmsMaleMedication SystemsMiddle AgedNeedlesAntineoplastic AgentslanreotideOctreotidePeptides, CyclicSomatostatincostLanreotideneuroendocrine tumorsoctreotidetime and motion

Identifiers

PMID30924737
PMCPMC6643159
OpenAlexW2934475215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.