Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30924684›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2019

The evolving role of image-guided biopsy and specimen fixation-update from an oncology setting.

Roshini Kulanthaivelu, Emily C Shaw, Ken T Tung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Roshini Kulanthaivelu1 Department of Radiology, University Hospital Southampton , Southampton , UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2279-8346
Emily C Shaw2 Department of Histopathology, University Hospital Southampton , Southampton , UK.
Ken T Tung1 Department of Radiology, University Hospital Southampton , Southampton , UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Image-guided biopsy is well established in clinical practice, however a recent shift towards "personalized medicine" and genomic research, particularly in the oncology setting, has resulted in a greater demand for tissue, not only at preliminary diagnosis but at multiple time points in the patient's journey. Research into the molecular pathobiology underpinning cancer development and progression continues to identify diagnostic, predictive and prognostic biomarkers that help determine and guide treatment both at the outset, and as patient's progress or recur. This extensive tissue analysis however, necessitates larger tissue cores and a greater number of biopsies with correct fixation of the specimens obtained. We discuss the impact that this shift towards genomic medicine has taken on both radiologists and histopathologists and stress the importance of correct specimen preparation as well as biopsy technique to maximize diagnostic yield, by reviewing different methods of specimen fixation that are now required in clinical practice dependent on the clinical question posed.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorHumansImage-Guided BiopsyNeoplasmsPrecision MedicineSpecimen HandlingTissue FixationWorkflowBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID30924684
PMCPMC6592078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.