Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30924578›Full record

Trial reportDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2019

Baseline nocturnal glucose change: A predictor of the treatment effect of bolus intensification in insulin-treated type 2 diabetes.

Anne L Peters, Milivoj Piletič, Johan Ejstrud, Karen Salvesen-Sykes, James Snyder, Keith Bowering

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01850615 (Efficacy and Safety of FIAsp in a Basal-bolus Regimen Versus Basal Insulin Therapy, Both in Combination With Metformin in Adult Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01850615 phase3completednot on this map

Efficacy and Safety of FIAsp in a Basal-bolus Regimen Versus Basal Insulin Therapy, Both in Combination With Metformin in Adult Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes

TypeinterventionalSponsorNovo Nordisk A/SRan2013 to 2014Enrolled323ConditionsDiabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2ArmsFaster-acting insulin aspart, basal insulin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Anne L PetersClinical Diabetes Program, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0003-0520-0776
Milivoj PiletičGeneral Hospital, Novo Mesto, Slovenia.
Johan EjstrudNovo Nordisk A/S, Aalborg, Denmark.
Karen Salvesen-SykesNovo Nordisk Inc., Plainsboro, New Jersey.
James SnyderNovo Nordisk Inc., Plainsboro, New Jersey.
Keith BoweringDivision of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Novo Nordisk (United States) · USNovo Nordisk (Denmark) · DKSchool of Business and Management Novo Mesto · SIUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This post hoc analysis of an 18-week randomized trial explored the utility of calculating baseline glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), postprandial glucose (PPG) increments and nocturnal glucose change in predicting efficacy and safety outcomes in response to bolus insulin intensification in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Analyses were conducted on 236 participants with T2D receiving metformin: 116 received fast-acting insulin aspart (faster aspart) basal-bolus therapy and 120 received basal-only insulin. Participants were grouped according to baseline HbA1c, PPG increments and nocturnal glucose change variables; analyses were performed on the end-of-trial treatment differences between "high" and "low" baseline values. The change from baseline in end-of-trial mean HbA1c and mean PPG increments was in favour of faster aspart across all subgroups. Significantly greater treatment differences were observed in participants with high (vs. low) baseline nocturnal glucose change and PPG increments. For baseline HbA1c, significantly greater treatment differences were observed for change in end-of-trial PPG increments, but not end-of-trial HbA1c. In conclusion, both nocturnal glucose change and PPG increments may be more useful than HbA1c for identifying subgroups of people with T2D who would most benefit from bolus intensification.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Hypoglycemic AgentsInsulinBlood GlucoseGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemiaPostprandial PeriodBlood GlucoseGlycated HemoglobinHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinclinical trialinsulin therapyrandomized trialtype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID30924578
PMCPMC6618272
OpenAlexW2932567006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.