Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30924299›Full record

ArticleMicrobiologyOpen2019

Shifting national surveillance of Shigella infections toward geno-serotyping by the development of a tailored Luminex assay and NGS workflow.

Eleonora Ventola, Bert Bogaerts, Sigrid C J De Keersmaecker, Kevin Vanneste, Nancy H C Roosens, Wesley Mattheus, Pieter-Jan Ceyssens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MicrobiologyOpen, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. ShigaPass: anMicrobial genomics · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Historical, current, and emerging tools for identification and serotyping of Shigella.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eleonora VentolaNational Reference Centre of Salmonella and Shigella, Brussels, Belgium.
Bert BogaertsTransversal activities in Applied Genomics, Brussels, Belgium.
Sigrid C J De KeersmaeckerTransversal activities in Applied Genomics, Brussels, Belgium.
Kevin VannesteTransversal activities in Applied Genomics, Brussels, Belgium.
Nancy H C RoosensTransversal activities in Applied Genomics, Brussels, Belgium.
Wesley MattheusNational Reference Centre of Salmonella and Shigella, Brussels, Belgium.
Pieter-Jan CeyssensNational Reference Centre of Salmonella and Shigella, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-7735-8316

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The phylogenetically closely related Shigella species and enteroinvasive Escherichia coli (EIEC) are responsible for millions of episodes of bacterial dysenteriae worldwide. Given its distinct epidemiology and public health relevance, only Shigellae are subject to mandatory reporting and follow-up by public health authorities. However, many clinical laboratories struggle to differentiate non-EIEC, EIEC, and Shigella in their current workflows, leading to inaccuracies in surveillance and rising numbers of misidentified E. coli samples at the National Reference Centre (NRC). In this paper, we describe two novel tools to enhance Shigella surveillance. First, we developed a low-cost Luminex-based multiplex assay combining five genetic markers for species identification with 11 markers for serotype prediction for S. sonnei and S. flexneri isolates. Using a test panel of 254 clinical samples, this assay has a sensitivity of 100% in differentiation of EIEC/Shigella pathotype from non-EIEC strains, and 68.7% success rate in distinction of Shigella and EIEC. A novel, and particularly successful marker was a Shigella-specific deletion in the spermidine acetyltransferase gene speG, reflecting its metabolic decay. For Shigella serotype prediction, the multiplex assay scored a sensitivity and specificity of 96.6% and 98.4%, respectively. All discrepancies were analyzed with whole-genome sequencing and shown to be related to causative mutations (stop codons, indels, and promoter mutations) in glycosyltransferase genes. This observation spurred the development of an in silico workflow which extracts the Shigella serotype from Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) data, taking into account gene functionality. Both tools will be implemented in the workflow of the NRC, and will play a major role in the shift from phenotypic to genotyping-based surveillance of shigellosis in Belgium.

Indexed as

Epidemiological MonitoringGenotyping TechniquesImmunoassayBelgiumDysentery, BacillaryEscherichia coliHumansMolecular EpidemiologySensitivity and SpecificitySerotypingShigella flexneriShigella sonneiWorkflowLuminexmultiplexpublic health surveillancesequencingShigella

Identifiers

PMID30924299
PMCPMC6692546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.