Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30924264›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2019

Egomotion-related visual areas respond to active leg movements.

Chiara Serra, Claudio Galletti, Sara Di Marco, Patrizia Fattori, Gaspare Galati, Valentina Sulpizio, Sabrina Pitzalis

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Topological Maps and Brain Computations From Low to High.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chiara SerraDepartment of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome "Foro Italico", Rome, Italy.
Claudio GallettiDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Sara Di MarcoDepartment of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome "Foro Italico", Rome, Italy.
Patrizia FattoriDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Gaspare GalatiDepartment of Cognitive and Motor Rehabilitation and Neuroimaging, Santa Lucia Foundation (IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia), Rome, Italy.
Valentina SulpizioDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Sabrina PitzalisDepartment of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome "Foro Italico", Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4445-0391
Foro Italico University of Rome · ITUniversity of Bologna · ITFondazione Santa Lucia · IT

Funding

PRIN 2015AWSW2YThe University of Foro Italico CDR2.FFABR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monkey neurophysiology and human neuroimaging studies have demonstrated that passive viewing of optic flow stimuli activates a cortical network of temporal, parietal, insular, and cingulate visual motion regions. Here, we tested whether the human visual motion areas involved in processing optic flow signals simulating self-motion are also activated by active lower limb movements, and hence are likely involved in guiding human locomotion. To this aim, we used a combined approach of task-evoked activity and resting-state functional connectivity by fMRI. We localized a set of six egomotion-responsive visual areas (V6+, V3A, intraparietal motion/ventral intraparietal [IPSmot/VIP], cingulate sulcus visual area [CSv], posterior cingulate sulcus area [pCi], posterior insular cortex [PIC]) by using optic flow. We tested their response to a motor task implying long-range active leg movements. Results revealed that, among these visually defined areas, CSv, pCi, and PIC responded to leg movements (visuomotor areas), while V6+, V3A, and IPSmot/VIP did not (visual areas). Functional connectivity analysis showed that visuomotor areas are connected to the cingulate motor areas, the supplementary motor area, and notably to the medial portion of the somatosensory cortex, which represents legs and feet. We suggest that CSv, pCi, and PIC perform the visual analysis of egomotion-like signals to provide sensory information to the motor system with the aim of guiding locomotion.

Indexed as

AdultBrain MappingFemaleGyrus CinguliHumansLegMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMovementOptic FlowPhotic StimulationVisual CortexYoung Adultbrain mappingCSvfunctional connectivitylocomotionoptic flowself-motion

Identifiers

PMID30924264
PMCPMC6865514
OpenAlexW2925722244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.