ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2019
A comparison of static and dynamic ∆B
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Self-Derived Dynamic Field Map Estimation and Correction in CEST MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- CEST MRI: Translational prospects for intervertebral disc degeneration - from basic research to clinical applications.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Review
- A Novel CEST-Based Approach for Reliably Assessing Skeletal Muscle Oxidative Phosphorylation: OXCEST.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Evaluating the effectiveness of distortion self-correction for CEST-EPI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Rapid and simplified post-processing for simultaneousMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer Imaging in Neuroinflammation: Methods, Challenges, and Recommendations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Motion and magnetic field inhomogeneity correction techniques for chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI: A contemporary review.NMR in biomedicine · 2025Review
- In vivo imaging of glycogen in human muscle.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Fast and motion-robust saturation transfer MRI with inherent BMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
- Improved dynamic distortion correction for fMRI using single-echo EPI and a readout-reversed first image (REFILL).Human brain mapping · 2023Article
- Role of Imaging Modalities andACS chemical neuroscience · 2023Article
- A method for measuring BMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2023Article
- Proton exchange rate of chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI constructed from direct saturation-removed omega plots to improve the assessment of patients with ischemic stroke.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022Article
- Review and consensus recommendations on clinical APT-weighted imaging approaches at 3T: Application to brain tumors.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2022Review
- Data-driven motion-corrected brain MRI incorporating pose-dependent BMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2022Article
- Molecular Imaging of Brain Tumors and Drug Delivery Using CEST MRI: Promises and Challenges.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Towards robust glucose chemical exchange saturation transfer imaging in humans at 3 T: Arterial input function measurements and the effects of infusion time.NMR in biomedicine · 2022Article
- Frequency drift in MR spectroscopy at 3T.NeuroImage · 2021Article
- Real-time motion and retrospective coil sensitivity correction for CEST using volumetric navigators (vNavs) at 7T.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2021Article
- Effect of Ketamine on Human Neurochemistry in Posterior Cingulate Cortex: A Pilot Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Study at 3 Tesla.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo assess the performance, in the presence of scanner instabilities, of three dynamic correction methods which integrate ∆B
methodsA homogeneous phantom and five healthy volunteers were scanned with a CEST sequence at 7 T. The in vivo measurements were performed twice: first with unaltered system frequency and again applying frequency shifts during the CEST acquisition. In all cases, retrospective voxel-wise ∆B
resultsAll three dynamic methods successfully mapped the induced drift. The intrinsic approaches were affected by the CEST labeling near water (∆ω < |0.3| ppm). The MTR
conclusionReliable correction of scanner instabilities is essential to establish clinical CEST MRI. The three dynamic approaches presented improved the ∆B
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.