ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2019
Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Interventions: An Emerging Field.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy and Safety of Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement in Patients With Moderate to Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Clinical Outcomes and Echocardiographic Indices.Health science reports · 2025Review
- Transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention techniques and procedural steps for the treatment of tricuspid regurgitation: a review of the literature.Open heart · 2022Review
- A Single-opening&closing Valve Tester for Direct Measurement of Closing Volume of the Heart Valve.Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2022Article
- A detailed mechanical and microstructural analysis of ovine tricuspid valve leaflets.Acta biomaterialia · 2020Article
- Treatment of isolated tricuspid regurgitation in 2020: an update.Faculty reviews · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis review aims to provide an updated overview and a clinical perspective on novel transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions (TTVI), highlighting potential challenges and future directions. RECENT
findingsSevere tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a predictor of mortality. However, a sizeable number of patients remain untreated until the end-stage when cardiac surgery presents a prohibitive risk. The emergent need in finding a treatment for patients with TR, deemed for surgery options, has encouraged the development of TTVI. These procedures mimic classical surgery techniques and are mainly divided in four categories: annuloplasty and coaptation devices, edge-to-edge techniques and transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement. Early studies showed promising results, but long-term follow-up data are not available. For patients with severe TR and high surgical risk, several percutaneous options are available. However, these therapies are in a growing phase and bigger studies and long term follow-up are needed to prove their efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30924027What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.