Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30923970›Full record

Trial reportOral and maxillofacial surgery2019

Ultrasound-guided arthrocentesis using single-puncture, double-lumen, single-barrel needle for patients with temporomandibular joint acute closed lock internal derangement.

Darpan Bhargava, Shaji Thomas, Pratiksha Pawar, Megha Jain, Pankaj Pathak

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06657118 (Ultrasound Guided Versus Conventional Arthrocentesis in Treatment of Temporomandibular Joint Internal Derangement), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06657118 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Ultrasound Guided Versus Conventional Arthrocentesis in Treatment of Temporomandibular Joint Internal Derangement: A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSamiha Abdelsalam Abdelaziz AbdelazizRan2025 to 2026Enrolled34ConditionsInternal Derangement of the Tempromandibular JointArmsUltrasound guided arthrocentesis of tempromandibular joint, Conventional anatomically guided arthrocentesis of tempromandibular joint
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Darpan BhargavaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, People's College of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, People's University, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, 462037, India.
Shaji ThomasDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, People's College of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, People's University, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, 462037, India.
Pratiksha PawarDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, People's College of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, People's University, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, 462037, India. drpratikshapawar@gmail.com.
Megha JainDepartment of Imaging and Radiodiagnosis, L.N. Medical College and Research Centre and J.K. Hospital, J.K. Town, Sarvdharm C-Sector, Kolar Road, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, 462042, India.
Pankaj PathakDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, People's College of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, People's University, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, 462037, India.
People’s University · INSarojini Naidu Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTemporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc derangement is defined as a malpositioning of the articular disc relative to the condyle and eminence. Arthrocentesis of the TMJ is considered by many as the first-line surgical treatment for patients who do not respond to conservative treatment. The aim of this study is to assist needle insertion for temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis using ultrasonography. MATERIALS AND

methodTwenty patients who required arthrocentesis of the TMJ were randomly assigned to two groups A and B undergoing single-puncture arthrocentesis with modified double-lumen single-barrel needle and ultrasound-guided single-puncture arthrocentesis using modified double-lumen single-barrel needle (n = 10 in each group). The number of attempts of needle manipulation, duration of the operative procedural time, and visual analog (VAS) scale score for pain to assess surgical discomfort were the main outcome variables.

resultsNone of the patients in either group developed any complication with no significant difference in VAS score for pain between the two study groups. The number of attempts for needle manipulation (mean ± SD) for group A was 2.20 ± 0.789, and for group B, it was 1.10 ± 0.316 (p value, 0.0007); operative procedural time (mean ± SD) for group A was 18.5 ± 3.171 min, and for group B, it was 13.1 ± 1.663 (p value, 0.0002) which was significantly lesser in group A than in group B. The sentence signifies that the number of attempts that was required to re-insert the needle to enter the joint space in Ultrasound guided and conventional method of arthrocentesis.

conclusionUltrasound-guided single-puncture arthrocentesis using a customized needle is a promising method to perform joint lavage with minimal trauma and in a precise manner.

Indexed as

ArthrocentesisTemporomandibular Joint DisordersHumansPuncturesTemporomandibular JointTreatment OutcomeUltrasonographyUltrasonography, InterventionalClosed lock jawDisc displacementInternal derangementSingle-puncture arthrocentesisTemporomandibular jointUltrasound-guided arthrocentesis

Identifiers

PMID30923970
OpenAlexW2925761966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.