Article3D printing in medicine2019
Methods for verification of 3D printed anatomic model accuracy using cardiac models as an example.
Article in 3D printing in medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rule-based design verification for mechanical parts with dynamic rule subset selection.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Quality assurance of 3D-printed patient specific anatomical models: a systematic review.3D printing in medicine · 2024Article
- Navigating the intersection of 3D printing, software regulation and quality control for point-of-care manufacturing of personalized anatomical models.3D printing in medicine · 2023Article
- Three-dimensional printing accuracy analysis for medical applications across a wide variety of printers.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2023Article
- Management of Complex Acetabular Fractures by Using 3D Printed Models.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Article
- A multi-method assessment of 3D printed micromorphological osteological features.International journal of legal medicine · 2022Article
- Workflow to develop 3D designed personalized neonatal CPAP masks using iPhone structured light facial scanning.3D printing in medicine · 2022Article
- Medical 3D Printing Dimensional Accuracy for Multi-pathological Anatomical Models 3D Printed Using Material Extrusion.Journal of digital imaging · 2022Article
- 'Invisible' orthodontics by polymeric 'clear' aligners molded on 3D-printed personalized dental models.Regenerative biomaterials · 2022Article
- Computed Tomography as a Characterization Tool for Engineered Scaffolds with Biomedical Applications.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- 3D Printing of Physical Organ Models: Recent Developments and Challenges.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021Review
- Design and 3D printing of variant pediatric heart models for training based on a single patient scan.3D printing in medicine · 2021Article
- Advances in Filament Structure of 3D Bioprinted Biodegradable Bone Repair Scaffolds.International journal of bioprinting · 2021Review
- Effects of Steam Sterilization on 3D Printed Biocompatible Resin Materials for Surgical Guides-An Accuracy Assessment Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Development of a three-dimensional printed heart from computed tomography images of a plastinated specimen for learning anatomy.Anatomy & cell biology · 2020Article
- Three-dimensional printing in congenital heart disease.Journal of thoracic disease · 2020Review
- An investigation into the effect of changing the computed tomography slice reconstruction interval on the spatial replication accuracy of three-dimensional printed anatomical models constructed by fused deposition modelling.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMedical 3D printing has brought the manufacturing world closer to the patient's bedside than ever before. This requires hospitals and their personnel to update their quality assurance program to more appropriately accommodate the 3D printing fabrication process and the challenges that come along with it.
resultsIn this paper, we explored different methods for verifying the accuracy of a 3D printed anatomical model. Methods included physical measurements, digital photographic measurements, surface scanning, photogrammetry, and computed tomography (CT) scans. The details of each verification method, as well as their benefits and challenges, are discussed.
conclusionThere are multiple methods for model verification, each with benefits and drawbacks. The choice of which method to adopt into a quality assurance program is multifactorial and will depend on the type of 3D printed models being created, the training of personnel, and what resources are available within a 3D printed laboratory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.