Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30923919›Full record

ArticleActa neurochirurgica2019

Functional and patient-reported outcome versus in-hospital costs after traumatic acute subdural hematoma (t-ASDH): a neurosurgical paradox?

Jeroen T J M van Dijck, Thomas A van Essen, Mark D Dijkman, Cassidy Q B Mostert, Suzanne Polinder, Wilco C Peul, Godard C W de Ruiter

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jeroen T J M van DijckDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Neurosurgical Center Holland (UNCH), Leiden University Medical Center & Haaglanden Medical Center & Haga Teaching Hospital, Leiden/The Hague, The Netherlands. j.t.j.m.van_dijck@lumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-9893-632X
Thomas A van EssenDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Neurosurgical Center Holland (UNCH), Leiden University Medical Center & Haaglanden Medical Center & Haga Teaching Hospital, Leiden/The Hague, The Netherlands.
Mark D DijkmanDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Neurosurgical Center Holland (UNCH), Leiden University Medical Center & Haaglanden Medical Center & Haga Teaching Hospital, Leiden/The Hague, The Netherlands.
Cassidy Q B MostertDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Neurosurgical Center Holland (UNCH), Leiden University Medical Center & Haaglanden Medical Center & Haga Teaching Hospital, Leiden/The Hague, The Netherlands.
Suzanne PolinderDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Wilco C PeulDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Neurosurgical Center Holland (UNCH), Leiden University Medical Center & Haaglanden Medical Center & Haga Teaching Hospital, Leiden/The Hague, The Netherlands.
Godard C W de RuiterDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Neurosurgical Center Holland (UNCH), Leiden University Medical Center & Haaglanden Medical Center & Haga Teaching Hospital, Leiden/The Hague, The Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLErasmus MC · NL

Funding

FP7 Health Grant 602150Hersenstichting Net-Qure
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe decision whether to operate or not in patients with a traumatic acute subdural hematoma (t-ASDH) can, in many cases, be a neurosurgical dilemma. There is a general conception that operating on severe cases leads to the survival of severely disabled patients and is associated with relatively high medical costs. There is however little information on the quality of life of patients after operation for t-ASDH, let alone on the cost-effectiveness.

methodsThis study retrospectively investigated patient outcome and in-hospital costs for 108 consecutive patients with a t-ASDH. Patient outcome was assessed using the Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) and the Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)-specific QOLIBRI questionnaire. The in-hospital costs were calculated using the Dutch guidelines for costs calculation.

resultsOut of 108 patients, 40 were classified as having sustained a mild (Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) 13-15), 19 a moderate (GCS 9-12), and 49 a severe (GCS 3-8) TBI. As expected, mortality rates increased with higher TBI severity (23%, 47%, and 61% respectively), whereas the chance for favorable outcome (GOS 4-5) decreased (72%, 47%, and 29%). Interestingly, the mean QOLIBRI scores for survivors were quite similar between the TBI severity groups (61, 61, and 64). Healthcare consumption and in-hospital costs increased with TBI severity. In-hospital costs were relatively high (€24,980), especially after emergency surgery (€28,670) and when additional ICP monitoring was used (€36,580).

conclusionsAlthough this study confirms that outcome is often "unfavorable" after t-ASDH, it also shows that "favorable" outcome can be achieved, even in the most severely injured patients. In-hospital treatment costs were substantial and mainly related to TBI severity, with admission and surgery as main cost drivers. These results serve as a basis for necessary future research focusing on the value-based cost-effectiveness of surgical treatment of patients with a t-ASDH.

Indexed as

Hospital CostsPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresAdultAgedBrain Injuries, TraumaticFemaleHematoma, Subdural, AcuteHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeurosurgical ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsQuality of LifeAcute subdural hematomaHealthcare costsPatient outcomeTraumatic brain injuryTreatment

Identifiers

PMID30923919
PMCPMC6483942
OpenAlexW2935315880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.