Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30923786›Full record

ReviewAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2019

Treatment and clinical outcome of clinical T4 esophageal cancer: A systematic review.

Tomoki Makino, Makoto Yamasaki, Koji Tanaka, Yasuhiro Miyazaki, Tsuyoshi Takahashi, Yukinori Kurokawa, Masaaki Motoori, Yutaka Kimura, Kiyokazu Nakajima, Masaki Mori and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Role of surgery in T4N0-3M0 esophageal cancer.World journal of surgical oncology · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tomoki MakinoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Graduate School of Medicine Osaka University Osaka Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7918-4217
Makoto YamasakiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Graduate School of Medicine Osaka University Osaka Japan.
Koji TanakaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Graduate School of Medicine Osaka University Osaka Japan.
Yasuhiro MiyazakiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Graduate School of Medicine Osaka University Osaka Japan.
Tsuyoshi TakahashiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Graduate School of Medicine Osaka University Osaka Japan.
Yukinori KurokawaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Graduate School of Medicine Osaka University Osaka Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2883-0132
Masaaki MotooriDepartment of Surgery Osaka General Medical Center Osaka Japan.
Yutaka KimuraDepartment of Surgery Faculty of Medicine Kindai University Osaka Japan.
Kiyokazu NakajimaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Graduate School of Medicine Osaka University Osaka Japan.
Masaki MoriDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Graduate School of Medicine Osaka University Osaka Japan.
Yuichiro DokiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Graduate School of Medicine Osaka University Osaka Japan.
Osaka City University · JPKindai University · JPOsaka Prefectural Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurvival of patients with cT4 esophageal cancer is dismal. Although the optimal treatment strategy remains to be established, two treatment options are available for cT4 esophageal cancers: definitive chemoradiation (dCRT) and induction treatment followed by conversion surgery (CS). However, little is known concerning the differences in clinical outcome between patients with T4 esophageal tumors treated with dCRT and those eventually treated with CS.

methodsA systematic search of the scientific literature on PubMed/MEDLINE was carried out using the keywords "T4 esophageal cancer," "invading (involving) adjacent organ," "definitive chemoradiation," "induction therapy," "salvage surgery," and "conversion surgery," obtaining 28 reports published up to July 2018. RESULTS/

conclusionWe found that CS was superior to dCRT with respect to local disease control and short-term survival; however, CS was associated with relatively higher perioperative mortality and morbidity. Alternatively, although dCRT might often cause fistula formation, a clinical complete response to dCRT is likely to lead to a better prognosis. Recent advances in chemotherapeutic agents have led to triple induction chemotherapy, with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF), which has shown promise as an initial induction treatment for cT4 esophageal cancer. Indeed, this regimen could control both local and systemic disease, which enables curative resection without preoperative CRT. Moreover, some appropriate changes in perioperative management and intensive systemic chemotherapy might enhance patient outcome. Randomized controlled trials with a large sample size are needed to establish the standard treatment for cT4 esophageal cancer.

Indexed as

conversion surgerydefinitive chemoradiationesophageal cancerinduction chemotherapyT4

Identifiers

PMID30923786
PMCPMC6422802
OpenAlexW2905006371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.