ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2019
Bridge-Enhanced Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair: Two-Year Results of a First-in-Human Study.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
91 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 160 citations in OpenAlex.
- ACL repair vs. reconstruction: a meta-analysis of outcomes across different tear characteristics.BMC surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Anterior cruciate ligament primary repair revision rates are increased in skeletally mature patients under the age of 21 compared to reconstruction, while adults (>21 years) show no significant difference: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025Pooled it
- Acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture: can repair become an alternative to reconstruction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Pooled it
- Restoring Knee Flexor Strength Symmetry Requires 2 Years After ACL Reconstruction, But Does It Matter for Second ACL Injuries? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Sports medicine - open · 2024Pooled it
- Reduced knee laxity and failure rate following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction compared with repair for acute tears: a meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2023Pooled it
- Early MRI-based quantitative outcomes are associated with a positive functional performance trajectory from 6 to 24 months post-ACL surgery.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023Trial
- Females Have Earlier Muscle Strength and Functional Recovery After Bridge-Enhanced Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair.Tissue engineering. Part A · 2020Trial
- Bridge-Enhanced Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair Is Not Inferior to Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction at 2 Years: Results of a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial.The American journal of sports medicine · 2020Trial
- Autologous Peripheral Blood-Derived Stem Cells Combined with Platelet-Rich Plasma is Associated With Clinical and Radiological Improvement in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Ruptures-Preliminary Clinical and MRI Findings in 47 Consecutive Patients.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Bridge-Enhanced Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair versus Autograft Reconstruction in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026Review
- Comparing Bridge-Enhanced Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair to Standard Autograft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Biomechanical and Clinical Outcomes.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026Article
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of Bridge-Enhanced ACL Restoration: An Imaging Atlas of Morphological Features and Healing Trajectories.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- Postcommercialisation outcomes of bridge-enhanced anterior cruciate ligament restoration: The first 100 Bridge registry patients.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026Article
- Advancement of an automatic segmentation pipeline for metallic artifact removal in post-surgical ACL MRI.Magnetic resonance imaging · 2025Article
- Biologic Therapies in the Management of Sports-Related Tendon and Ligament Injuries: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes of Bridge-Enhanced ACL Restoration (BEAR).Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2025Review
- Histological Analysis of Bridge-Enhanced ACL Restoration (BEAR) Tissue in Ligament Retears.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Mechanisms and Management of Knee Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury; A Review.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2025Review
- Deciding Between ACL Reconstruction, Repair, and Conservative Treatment in Young Athletes: A Systematic Narrative Review.Open access journal of sports medicine · 2025Review
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Stump Elongation Technique for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Restoration.Arthroscopy techniques · 2024Article
31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBridge-enhanced anterior cruciate ligament repair (BEAR) combines suture repair of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) with a specific extracellular matrix scaffold (the BEAR scaffold) that is placed in the gap between the torn ends of the ACL to facilitate ligament healing. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to report the 12- and 24-month outcomes of patients who underwent the BEAR procedure compared with a nonrandomized concurrent control group who underwent ACL reconstruction (ACLR) with an autograft. We hypothesized that the BEAR group would have physical examination findings, patient-reported outcomes, and adverse events that were similar to those of the ACLR group. STUDY
designCohort study; Level of evidence, 2.
methodsTen patients underwent BEAR, and 10 underwent ACLR with a 4-stranded hamstring autograft. At 24 months, 9 of the 10 BEAR patients and 7 of the 10 ACLR patients completed a study visit. Outcomes reported included International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective and objective results, knee anteroposterior (AP) laxity findings via an arthrometer, and functional outcomes.
resultsThere were no graft or repair failures in the first 24 months after surgery. The IKDC subjective scores in both groups improved significantly from baseline (
conclusionIn this small, first-in-human study, BEAR produced similar outcomes to ACLR with a hamstring autograft. BEAR may result in knee stability and patient-reported outcomes at 2 years sufficient to warrant longer term studies of efficacy in larger groups of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.