Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30923676›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical & translational endocrinology2019

Accuracy of five plasma calibrated glucometers to screen for and diagnose gestational diabetes mellitus in a low resource clinic setting.

Lynnsay M Dickson, Eckhart J Buchmann, Charl Janse van Rensburg, Shane A Norris

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical & translational endocrinology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Performance of point-of-care glucose testing for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes in South Africa.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Availability and pricing of insulin and related diagnostics in South Africa.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Health literacy and diabetes control in pregnant women.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lynnsay M DicksonFCP(SA), MRC Developmental Pathways to Health Research Unit, Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, York Road, Parktown, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Eckhart J BuchmannDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, York Road, Parktown, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Charl Janse van RensburgBiostatistics Unit, South African Medical Research Council, 1 Soutpansberg Road, Pretoria, South Africa.
Shane A NorrisMRC Developmental Pathways to Health Research Unit, Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, York Road, Parktown, Johannesburg, South Africa.
South African Medical Research Council · ZAUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsWe investigated the clinical and analytic accuracy of five plasma calibrated glucometers, the use of which is advocated by the World Health Organisation and the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, to screen for and diagnose gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in low resource settings.

methods592 consecutive black African women underwent a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at 24-28 weeks gestation at an urban South African community health clinic. Capillary glucose was measured by one of five glucometer brands, each paired with a routine laboratory hexokinase method of plasma glucose measurement. The laboratory results served as the gold standard reference test for GDM diagnosis. World Health Organisation GDM diagnostic thresholds were applied to glucometer and laboratory results.

resultsGlucometer and laboratory determined GDM prevalence was 75/592 (12.7%) and 30/592 (5.1%) with an elevated fasting glucose diagnostic in 64/75 (85%) and 24/30 (80%) of cases respectively. The proportion of glucometer results fulfilling ISO 15197:2013 recommended analytic accuracy at fasting, 60, and 120 min of the OGTT was 92.4%, 49.8% and 61.5%, with Bland Altman method revealing a positive glucometer bias of 0.22 mmol/l (-0.69-1.12 mmol/l), 0.96 mmol/l (-0.65-2.56 mmol/l) and 0.73 mmol/l (-0.73-2.19 mmol/l) respectively. Only three of the glucometer brands evaluated fulfilled ISO 15197:2013 analytic accuracy requirements and this was only achieved at fasting. All glucometers tested were inaccurate at one and two hours of the OGTT.

conclusionsNot all glucometers may be suitable for GDM screening as only three were accurate compared to the reference test and then only at fasting of the OGTT. Importantly, laboratory fasting glucose was diagnostic of GDM in 80% of cases in this study population.

Indexed as

Capillary glucoseFasting glucoseGestational diabetesScreening, primary care

Identifiers

PMID30923676
PMCPMC6424057
OpenAlexW2904834889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.