Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30923674›Full record

ReviewPhotoacoustics2019

Photoacoustic imaging with low-cost sources; A review.

Mohsen Erfanzadeh, Quing Zhu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Photoacoustics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. LED-based optoacoustic tomography of mice.Journal of biomedical optics · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Enhanced Dye-Sensitized Mechanosensation Utilizing Pulsed and Digitally Modulated Light.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review of Deep Learning Approaches for Interleaved Photoacoustic and Ultrasound (PAUS) Imaging.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mohsen ErfanzadehDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.
Quing ZhuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA.

Funding

Co-registered photoacoustic and ultrasound imaging for non-invasive ovarian canR01CA151570 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BREWER, MOLLY A., ZHU, QUING · 2011 to 2015
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA151570
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Benefitting from advantages of optical and ultrasound imaging, photoacoustic imaging (PAI) has demonstrated potentials in a wide range of medical applications. In order to facilitate clinical applications of PAI and encourage its application in low-resource settings, research on low-cost photoacoustic imaging with inexpensive optical sources has gained attention. Here, we review the advances made in photoacoustic imaging with low-cost sources.

Indexed as

Laser diodeLight emitting diodeLow-costMedical imagingPhotoacoustic imaging

Identifiers

PMID30923674
PMCPMC6423351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.