Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30923654›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2019

The transcriptomic response to a short day to long day shift in leaves of the reference legume

Geoffrey Thomson, James Taylor, Joanna Putterill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Plant direct · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Gene-editedFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. New Horizons in Plant Photoperiodism.Annual review of plant biology · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A Point Mutation inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Quantitative Control of Early Flowering in White Lupin (International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. The Candidate Photoperiod GeneFrontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Overexpression of MedicagoFrontiers in plant science · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Geoffrey ThomsonSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
James TaylorSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Joanna PutterillSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Photoperiodic flowering aligns plant reproduction to favourable seasons of the year to maximise successful production of seeds and grains. However understanding of this process in the temperate legumes of the Fabaceae family, which are important both agriculturally and ecologically, is incomplete. Previous work in the reference legume

Indexed as

Floral inductionFlowering timeFTLegumeLong dayMedicago truncatulaPhotoperiodRNA-SeqShort dayTranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID30923654
PMCPMC6432905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.