Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30923652›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2019

Pain neuroscience education on YouTube.

Lauren C Heathcote, Joshua W Pate, Anna L Park, Hayley B Leake, G Lorimer Moseley, Corey A Kronman, Molly Fischer, Inge Timmers, Laura E Simons

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Are DISCERN and JAMA Suitable Instruments for Assessing YouTube Videos on Thyroid Cancer? Methodological Concerns.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2020
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lauren C HeathcoteAnesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Joshua W PateFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Anna L ParkAnesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Hayley B LeakeSchool of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
G Lorimer MoseleySchool of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Corey A KronmanAnesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Molly FischerAnesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Inge TimmersAnesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Laura E SimonsAnesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe Internet in general, and YouTube in particular, is now one of the most popular sources of health-related information. Pain neuroscience education has become a primary tool for managing persistent pain, based in part on the discovery that information about pain can change pain. Our objective was to examine the availability, characteristics, and content of YouTube videos that address the neuroscience of pain.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review of videos on YouTube using the search terms "pain education", "what is pain", and "pain brain" in January 2018. Videos were included if they were in English, were under 10 minutes long, and included information on the neuroscience of pain. Videos were coded for (i) descriptive characteristics (e.g., number of views, duration on YouTube), (ii) source and style, (iii) whether or not they addressed seven pre-determined target concepts of pain neuroscience education (e.g., 'Pain is not an accurate marker of tissue state'), and (iv) how engaging they were.

resultsWe found 106 unique videos that met the inclusion criteria. The videos ranged from having four views to over five million views ( DISCUSSION: YouTube contains a variety of videos that practitioners, patients, and families may view to access pain neuroscience education information. A small portion of these videos addressed one or more target concepts of pain neuroscience education in an engaging manner. It is yet to be determined to what extent patients are able to learn information from these videos, to what extent the videos promote behavior change, and thus to what extent the videos may be useful for clinical practice.

Indexed as

Chronic painE-healthInternetPainPain educationPain Neuroscience EducationPersistent painPsycho-educationSystematic reviewYouTube

Identifiers

PMID30923652
PMCPMC6432903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.