Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30923622›Full record

ArticleFungal biology and biotechnology2019

Development of microtiter plate scale CRISPR/Cas9 transformation method for

Joosu Kuivanen, Veera Korja, Sami Holmström, Peter Richard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fungal biology and biotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Manipulation of the Global RegulatorACS chemical biology · 2022
    Article
  11. Use of ambrAMB Express · 2022
    Article
  12. CRISPR/Cas9-Based Genome Editing and Its Application inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  13. Transcriptional Activation of Biosynthetic Gene Clusters in Filamentous Fungi.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joosu Kuivanen *1VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd, P.O. Box 1000, 02044 Espoo, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-3529-9519
Veera Korja *1VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd, P.O. Box 1000, 02044 Espoo, Finland.
Sami Holmström1VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd, P.O. Box 1000, 02044 Espoo, Finland.
Peter Richard1VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd, P.O. Box 1000, 02044 Espoo, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe CRISPR/Cas9 is currently the predominant technology to enhance the genome editing efficiency in eukaryotes. Established tools for many fungal species exist while most of them are based on in vivo expressed Cas9 and guide RNA (gRNA). Alternatively, in vitro assembled Cas9 and gRNA ribonucleoprotein complexes can be used in genome editing, however, only a few examples have been reported in fungi. In general, high-throughput compatible transformation workflows for filamentous fungi are immature.

resultsIn this study, a CRISPR/Cas9 facilitated transformation and genome editing method based on in vitro assembled ribonucleoprotein complexes was developed for the filamentous fungus

conclusionsThe developed microtiter plate compatible CRISPR/Cas9 method provides a basis for high-throughput genome editing workflows in

Indexed as

Aspergillus nigerAutomationCRISPRGalactarateGalacturonateGenome editingHigh-throughputMetabolic engineeringMucic acidPectin

Identifiers

PMID30923622
PMCPMC6419801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.