Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30923582›Full record

ReviewGenes & nutrition2019

Biomarkers of food intake for nuts and vegetable oils: an extensive literature search.

Mar Garcia-Aloy, Paul J M Hulshof, Sheila Estruel-Amades, Maryse C J Osté, Maria Lankinen, Johanna M Geleijnse, Janette de Goede, Marynka Ulaszewska, Fulvio Mattivi, Stephan J L Bakker and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes & nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Diet, gut microbiota, and health: a review.Food science and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Nutritional aphrodisiacs: Biochemistry and Pharmacology.Current research in food science · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Mar Garcia-Aloy1Biomarkers and Nutrimetabolomics Laboratory, Department of Nutrition, Food Sciences and Gastronomy, XaRTA, INSA, Faculty of Pharmacy and Food Sciences, Campus Torribera, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Paul J M Hulshof3Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Sheila Estruel-Amades1Biomarkers and Nutrimetabolomics Laboratory, Department of Nutrition, Food Sciences and Gastronomy, XaRTA, INSA, Faculty of Pharmacy and Food Sciences, Campus Torribera, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Maryse C J OstéDepartment of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Maria Lankinen5School of Medicine, Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Johanna M Geleijnse3Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Janette de Goede3Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Marynka Ulaszewska6Department of Food Quality and Nutrition, Research Innovation Center, Fondazione Edmund Mach, Via Mach 1, 38010 San Michele all'Adige, TN Italy.
Fulvio Mattivi6Department of Food Quality and Nutrition, Research Innovation Center, Fondazione Edmund Mach, Via Mach 1, 38010 San Michele all'Adige, TN Italy.
Stephan J L BakkerDepartment of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Ursula Schwab5School of Medicine, Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Cristina Andres-Lacueva1Biomarkers and Nutrimetabolomics Laboratory, Department of Nutrition, Food Sciences and Gastronomy, XaRTA, INSA, Faculty of Pharmacy and Food Sciences, Campus Torribera, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Wageningen University & Research · NLFondazione Edmund Mach · ITUniversitat de Barcelona · ESUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Eastern Finland · FICentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nuts and vegetable oils are important sources of fat and of a wide variety of micronutrients and phytochemicals. Following their intake, several of their constituents, as well as their derived metabolites, are found in blood circulation and in urine. As a consequence, these could be used to assess the compliance to a dietary intervention or to determine habitual intake of nuts and vegetable oils. However, before these metabolites can be widely used as biomarkers of food intake (BFIs), several characteristics have to be considered, including specificity, dose response, time response, stability, and analytical performance. We have, therefore, conducted an extensive literature search to evaluate current knowledge about potential BFIs of nuts and vegetable oils. Once identified, the strengths and weaknesses of the most promising candidate BFIs have been summarized. Results from selected studies have provided a variety of compounds mainly derived from the fatty fraction of these foods, but also other components and derived metabolites related to their nutritional composition. In particular, α-linolenic acid, urolithins, and 5-hydroxyindole-3-acetic acid seem to be the most plausible candidate BFIs for walnuts, whereas for almonds they could be α-tocopherol and some catechin-derived metabolites. Similarly, several studies have reported a strong association between selenium levels and consumption of Brazil nuts. Intake of vegetable oils has been mainly assessed through the measurement of specific fatty acids in different blood fractions, such as oleic acid for olive oil, α-linolenic acid for flaxseed (linseed) and rapeseed (canola) oils, and linoleic acid for sunflower oil. Additionally, hydroxytyrosol and its metabolites were the most promising distinctive BFIs for (extra) virgin olive oil. However, most of these components lack sufficient specificity to serve as BFIs. Therefore, additional studies are necessary to discover new candidate BFIs, as well as to further evaluate the specificity, sensitivity, dose-response relationships, and reproducibility of these candidate biomarkers and to eventually validate them in other populations. For the discovery of new candidate BFIs, an untargeted metabolomics approach may be the most effective strategy, whereas for increasing the specificity of the evaluation of food consumption, this could be a combination of different metabolites.

Indexed as

BiomarkerIntakeMetabolomicsNutsOils

Identifiers

PMID30923582
PMCPMC6423890
OpenAlexW2942762927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.