Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30923564›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology for biofuels2019

Bacterial conversion of depolymerized Kraft lignin.

Krithika Ravi, Omar Y Abdelaziz, Matthias Nöbel, Javier García-Hidalgo, Marie F Gorwa-Grauslund, Christian P Hulteberg, Gunnar Lidén

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology for biofuels, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Microbiology spectrum · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Bacterial catabolism of acetovanillone, a lignin-derived compound.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  9. The Catabolic System of Acetovanillone and Acetosyringone inApplied and environmental microbiology · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Recent advances in the treatment of lignin in papermaking wastewater.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Development ofBiotechnology for biofuels · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Krithika Ravi1Department of Chemical Engineering, Lund University, P.O. Box 124, 221 00 Lund, Sweden.
Omar Y Abdelaziz1Department of Chemical Engineering, Lund University, P.O. Box 124, 221 00 Lund, Sweden.
Matthias Nöbel1Department of Chemical Engineering, Lund University, P.O. Box 124, 221 00 Lund, Sweden.
Javier García-Hidalgo2Department of Chemistry, Applied Microbiology, Lund University, P.O. Box 124, 221 00 Lund, Sweden.
Marie F Gorwa-Grauslund2Department of Chemistry, Applied Microbiology, Lund University, P.O. Box 124, 221 00 Lund, Sweden.
Christian P Hulteberg1Department of Chemical Engineering, Lund University, P.O. Box 124, 221 00 Lund, Sweden.
Gunnar Lidén1Department of Chemical Engineering, Lund University, P.O. Box 124, 221 00 Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1494-8201

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLignin is a potential feedstock for microbial conversion into various chemicals. However, the microbial degradation rate of native or technical lignin is low, and chemical depolymerization is needed to obtain reasonable conversion rates. In the current study, nine bacterial strains belonging to the

results

conclusions

Indexed as

Base-catalyzed depolymerizationBiorefineriesGuaiacolIndulin ATMicrobial conversionPseudomonasRhodococcus

Identifiers

PMID30923564
PMCPMC6420747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.