Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30923557›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England)2019

Prevalence and predictors of MRSA carriage among employees in a non-outbreak setting: a cross-sectional study in an acute care hospital.

Melanie Schubert, Daniel Kämpf, Lutz Jatzwauk, Franziska Kynast, Annette Stein, Ruth Strasser, Madeleine Dulon, Albert Nienhaus, Andreas Seidler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Occupational Infection Risk with Multidrug-Resistant Organisms in Health Personnel-A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. [Therapy-relevant antibiotic resistances in a One Health context].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Melanie Schubert1Institute and Policlinic of Occupational and Social Medicine, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4989-5522
Daniel Kämpf1Institute and Policlinic of Occupational and Social Medicine, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Lutz Jatzwauk2Department of Hospital Infection Control, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Franziska Kynast1Institute and Policlinic of Occupational and Social Medicine, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Annette Stein3Heart Center, University Hospital of the Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Ruth Strasser4Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Madeleine DulonDepartment of Occupational Medicine, Public Health and Hazardous Substances, Institution for Statutory Accident Insurance and Prevention in the Health and Welfare Services, Hamburg, Germany.
Albert NienhausDepartment of Occupational Medicine, Public Health and Hazardous Substances, Institution for Statutory Accident Insurance and Prevention in the Health and Welfare Services, Hamburg, Germany.
Andreas Seidler1Institute and Policlinic of Occupational and Social Medicine, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth care workers have an increased risk of being infected with Methicillin-resistant

methodsThe entire staff of a university hospital heart center for cardiologic maximum medical care and cardiac surgery were invited to participate in a cross-sectional study (

resultsThe majority of study participants had close contact to patients at work (

conclusionThe results of our study suggest low point prevalence rates of MRSA colonization in health care workers in a non-outbreak setting.

Indexed as

Health care workersMRSA prevalenceMRSA strainNon-outbreak settingRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID30923557
PMCPMC6419512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.