Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30923426›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2019

A Comparative Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Chitosan-Based Dressing and Conventional Method of Hemostasis in Patients on Oral Antithrombotic Therapy without Therapy Interruption.

Swetcha Seethamsetty, Godvine Sarepally, Arshiya Sanober, Yousuf Qureshi, Umayra Fatima, Shaik Mohammed Arif

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Local interventions for the management of alveolar osteitis (dry socket).The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Peripheral nerve repair: innovations and future directions.Journal of translational medicine · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Swetcha SeethamsettyDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Panineeya Mahavidyalaya Institute of Dental Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Godvine SarepallyDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dr. Godvines Clinique, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Arshiya SanoberDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Indian Dental Specialities, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Yousuf QureshiDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Malla Reddy Institute of Dental Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Umayra FatimaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Princess Esra Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Shaik Mohammed ArifDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, CKS Theja Dental College and Hospital, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Kamineni Institute of Dental Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AIMS AND

objectivesTo assess the effectiveness of chitosan-based dressing after extraction in individuals on antithrombotics, without modification of their treatment schedule. MATERIALS AND

methodsA randomized comparative study was carried out on 40 subjects who had two extraction sites, in dissimilar quadrants. The surgical site was chosen at random and post-extraction hemostasis was achieved by a custom-cut chitosan dressing (study site) and sterile cotton gauze dressing (suturing if required) at control site. Patients were reviewed on the first, third, fifth, and seventh postoperative days and every week till 4 weeks. The parameters assessed were timing of hemostasis, pain scores, and pus discharge.

resultsOut of 40 study subjects, 24 (60%) were males and 16 (40%) were females. The age was 40-65 years (mean age 54 years). The mean time for hemostasis was 0.63 ± 0.27 min in study group, whereas for controls, it was 9.10 ± 2.28 min. The difference in postoperative pain was significant (

conclusionChitosan dressing is a competent hemostatic agent that significantly reduced the post-extraction bleeding, with better pain control. Chitosan group had no incidences of dry socket and pus discharge.

Indexed as

Chitosanmyocardial infarctionoral antithrombotic drugspost- extraction bleedingthromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID30923426
PMCPMC6398305
OpenAlexW2911978731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.