Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30923346›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2019

Parafibromin immunostainings of parathyroid tumors in clinical routine: a near-decade experience from a tertiary center.

C Christofer Juhlin, Inga-Lena Nilsson, Kristina Lagerstedt-Robinson, Adam Stenman, Robert Bränström, Emma Tham, Anders Höög

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Critical Insights into Parathyroid Cancer.Journal of cancer science and clinical therapeutics · 2026
    Article
  2. Avoiding overdiagnosis of parathyroid carcinoma.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026
    Review
  3. Parathyroid carcinoma: epidemiology and genetics.Endocrine oncology (Bristol, England) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. The Consistency ofInternational journal of endocrinology · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Phenotypic Profiling and Molecular Mechanisms in Hyperparathyroidism-jaw Tumor Syndrome.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Immunohistochemical Profile of Parathyroid Tumours: A Comprehensive Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

C Christofer JuhlinDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. christofer.juhlin@ki.se.
Inga-Lena NilssonDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Kristina Lagerstedt-RobinsonDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Adam StenmanDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Robert BränströmDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Emma ThamDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Anders HöögDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska University Hospital · SEKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cell division cycle 73 gene is mutated in familial and sporadic forms of primary hyperparathyroidism, and the corresponding protein product parafibromin has been proposed as an adjunct immunohistochemical marker for the identification of cell division cycle 73 mutations and parathyroid carcinoma. Here, we present data from our experiences using parafibromin immunohistochemistry in parathyroid tumors since the marker was implemented in clinical routine in 2010. A total of 2019 parathyroid adenomas, atypical adenomas, and carcinomas were diagnosed in our department, and parafibromin staining was ordered for 297 cases with an initial suspicion of malignant potential to avoid excessive numbers of false positives. The most common inclusion criteria for immunohistochemistry were marked tumor weight (146 cases) and/or fibrosis (77 cases) and/or marked pleomorphism (58 cases). In total, 238 cases were informatively stained, and partial or complete loss of nuclear parafibromin immunoreactivity was noted in 40 cases; 10 out of 182 adenomas (5%), 27 out of 46 atypical adenomas (59%), and 7 out of 10 carcinomas (70%), with positive and negative predictive values of 85 and 90%, respectively for the detection of atypical adenomas/carcinomas versus adenomas, and 18 and 98%, respectively for carcinomas versus atypical adenomas/adenomas. Male patients with high-proliferative tumors were overrepresented among cases with aberrant parafibromin immunohistochemistry, and carcinomas more frequently harbored parafibromin aberrancies than atypical adenomas and adenomas (p < 0.001). We conclude that parafibromin immunohistochemistry is a useful marker in the clinical routine when applied on a pre-selected material of cases, with positive immunoreactivity as a confident rule out marker of malignancy.

Indexed as

ImmunohistochemistryAdenomaAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorCarcinomaCell ProliferationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedParathyroid NeoplasmsPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorCDC73 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID30923346
OpenAlexW2924837074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.