Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30923221›Full record

ArticleScience (New York, N.Y.)2019

The entorhinal cognitive map is attracted to goals.

Charlotte N Boccara, Michele Nardin, Federico Stella, Joseph O'Neill, Jozsef Csicsvari

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Science (New York, N.Y.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 102 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
102citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

102 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Subicular Plateaus Signal Reward Locations during Goal-Directed Behavior.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Distinct brain regions map olfactory and visual spaces.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

42 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Charlotte N BoccaraIST Austria, A-3400 Klosterneuburg, Austria. jozsef.csicsvari@ist.ac.at charlotte.boccara@medisin.uio.no.ORCID 0000-0001-7237-5109
Michele NardinIST Austria, A-3400 Klosterneuburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-8849-6570
Federico StellaIST Austria, A-3400 Klosterneuburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-9439-3148
Joseph O'NeillIST Austria, A-3400 Klosterneuburg, Austria.
Jozsef CsicsvariIST Austria, A-3400 Klosterneuburg, Austria. jozsef.csicsvari@ist.ac.at charlotte.boccara@medisin.uio.no.ORCID 0000-0002-5193-4036

Funding

European Research Council 281511
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Grid cells with their rigid hexagonal firing fields are thought to provide an invariant metric to the hippocampal cognitive map, yet environmental geometrical features have recently been shown to distort the grid structure. Given that the hippocampal role goes beyond space, we tested the influence of nonspatial information on the grid organization. We trained rats to daily learn three new reward locations on a cheeseboard maze while recording from the medial entorhinal cortex and the hippocampal CA1 region. Many grid fields moved toward goal location, leading to long-lasting deformations of the entorhinal map. Therefore, distortions in the grid structure contribute to goal representation during both learning and recall, which demonstrates that grid cells participate in mnemonic coding and do not merely provide a simple metric of space.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain MappingCA1 Region, HippocampalCognitionEntorhinal CortexGoalsGrid CellsLearningMaleMental RecallRatsRats, Inbred LECSpatial Navigation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.