ReviewBiochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular cell research2020
What's in a cardiomyocyte - And how do we make one through reprogramming?
Review in Biochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular cell research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Macrophage Mistargeting During Direct Cardiac Reprogramming: Cardiac-Associated Responses, Polarization, and Cell Death.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Development of a 3D nnU-Net-based cell tracking platform for quantifying myocardial deformation in zebrafish.iScience · 2026Article
- Combinatorial transcription factor interactions drive modular gene regulatory networks.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Review
- Cardiovascular Ischemia: Advancement and Potential Use of Collagen-Based Therapeutic Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Developments in Extracellular Matrix-Based Angiogenesis Therapy for Ischemic Heart Disease: A Review of Current Strategies, Methodologies and Future Directions.Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2025Review
- Guided Differentiation of Pluripotent Stem Cells into Heterogeneously Differentiating Cultures of Cardiac Cells.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- CardiOmics signatures reveal therapeutically actionable targets and drugs for cardiovascular diseases.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Comparative Analysis of Non-Coding RNA Transcriptomics in Heart Failure.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- Transforming growth factor-β in myocardial disease.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2022Review
- Review
- Molecular regulation of myocardial proliferation and regeneration.Cell regeneration (London, England) · 2021Review
- Strategies and Challenges to Improve Cellular Programming-Based Approaches for Heart Regeneration Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Reprogramming of Non-myocytes into Cardiomyocyte-like Cells: Challenges and Opportunities.Current cardiology reports · 2020Review
- Roles of Reactive Oxygen Species in Cardiac Differentiation, Reprogramming, and Regenerative Therapies.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Substantial progress is being made in the field cardiac reprogramming, and those in the field are hopeful that the technology will be formulated for therapeutic use. Beyond the excitement around generating a revolutionary new approach for treating ischemic heart diseases, cardiac reprogramming has delivered provocative findings that challenge common notions of cell fate and cell identity. Have we really made de novo cardiomyocytes? To answer this question, the essential characteristics of this unique and important cell type must first be defined. In this review, we walk through the history of scientific inquiry into cardiomyocytes, and then we examine the core features of cardiomyocytes as detailed in modern definitions. Informed by this, we turn to cardiac reprogramming to analyze the various screening approaches and ultimate factor combinations used in each study. We follow this with a dissection of the evidence used to support the authors' claims of successfully creating cardiomyocytes, and we end by discussing what is known about the molecular mechanisms of cardiac reprogramming. Through this analysis, we find interesting differences between the study designs and their results, but it becomes clear that the field at large is generating cells that closely match the textbook definition cardiomyocyte. However, the differences noted between the results of each study are largely unexplained, reflecting the need for further research in both cardiac reprogramming and in native cardiomyocyte biology. Knowledge gained from future research will help move the field towards better reprogramming techniques and technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.