Trial reportBrain stimulation
Significant improvement in treatment resistant auditory verbal hallucinations after 5 days of double-blind, randomized, sham controlled, fronto-temporal, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): A replication/extension study.
Trial report in Brain stimulation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01898299 (tDCS for Auditory Hallucinations in Schizophrenia), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
tDCS for Auditory Hallucinations in Schizophrenia
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Non-Clozapine interventions in treatment-resistant schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- Biomarker use in predicting transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) response: a systematic scoping review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- The effectiveness of non-pharmacological treatments for auditory verbal hallucinations in schizophrenia spectrum disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025Pooled it
- Accelerated neurostimulation protocols for auditory hallucinations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Across Mental Disorders: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis.JAMA network open · 2024Pooled it
- Heterogeneous Brain Abnormalities in Schizophrenia Converge on a Common Network Associated With Symptom Remission.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Improve Insight in Patients With Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2022Pooled it
- Evidence-Based Guidelines and Secondary Meta-Analysis for the Use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2021Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Treating Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA psychiatry · 2020Trial
- Assessing the efficacy and safety of rTMS, tDCS, and DBS in treating auditory hallucinations: a scoping review.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Review
- Physical Therapies and Neuromodulation for Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia: A Review of Potential Mechanisms, Efficacy, and Safety.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2026Review
- Common and unique white matter fractional anisotropy patterns in patients with schizophrenia with medication-resistant auditory verbal hallucinations: a retrospective tract-based spatial statistics study.Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Therapeutic efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation in treating auditory hallucinations in schizophrenia: A meta-analysis.World journal of psychiatry · 2025Article
- Knowing is Half the Battle: The Factors Leading to Efficient Recruitment of Representative Samples in Schizophrenia Research.Pharmaceutical medicine · 2025Article
- Disturbances in Auditory and Visual Perceptual Function in Schizophrenia: Patterns, Causes, and Consequences.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2025Review
- Recent social stress and severity of auditory hallucinations.Schizophrenia research · 2024Article
- The Less Things Change, the More They Remain the Same: Impaired Neural Plasticity as a Critical Target for Drug Development in Neuropsychiatry.Advances in neurobiology · 2024Review
- Early auditory processing dysfunction in schizophrenia: Mechanisms and implications.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2023Review
- Challenges and Strategies for the Recruitment of Patients With Schizophrenia in a Research Setting.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2022Article
- Pilot-RCT Finds No Evidence for Modulation of Neuronal Networks of Auditory Hallucinations by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.Brain sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a potentially novel treatment for antipsychotic-resistant auditory verbal hallucinations (AVH) in schizophrenia. Nevertheless, results have been mixed across studies.
methods89 schizophrenia/schizoaffective subjects (active: 47; Sham: 42) were randomized to five days of twice-daily 20-min active tDCS vs. sham treatments across two recruitment sites. AVH severity was assessed using the Auditory Hallucination Rating Scale (AHRS) total score. To assess target engagement, MRI was obtained in a sub sample.
resultsWe observed a statistically significant, moderate effect-size change in AHRS total score across one-week and one-month favoring active treatment following covariation for baseline symptoms and antipsychotic dose (p = 0.036; d = 0.48). Greatest change was observed on the AHRS loudness item (p = 0.003; d = 0.69). In exploratory analyses, greatest effects on AHRS were observed in patients with lower cognitive symptoms (d = 0.61). In target engagement analysis, suprathreshold mean field-strength (>0.2 V/m) was seen within language-sensitive regions. However, off-target field-strength, which correlated significantly with less robust clinical response, was observed in anterior regions.
conclusionsThis is the largest study of tDCS for persistent AVH conducted to date. We replicate previous reports of significant therapeutic benefit, but only if medication dosage is considered, with patients receiving lowest medication dosage showing greatest effect. Response was also greatest in patients with lowest levels of cognitive symptoms. Overall, these findings support continued development of tDCS for persistent AVH, but also suggest that response may be influenced by specific patient and treatment characteristics. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT01898299.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.