Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30922410›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2019

Recovery of knee extension and incidence of extension deficits following anterior cruciate ligament injury and treatment: a systematic review protocol.

Nalan Ektas, Corey Scholes, Selin Kulaga, Garry Kirwan, Binglong Lee, Christopher Bell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Knee joint biomechanics during gait improve from 3 to 6 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nalan EktasEBM Analytics, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Corey ScholesEBM Analytics, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6592-0738
Selin KulagaEBM Analytics, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Garry KirwanPhysiotherapy Department, Queen Elizabeth II Jubilee Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Binglong LeeOrthopaedics Department, Queen Elizabeth II Jubilee Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Christopher BellOrthopaedics Department, Queen Elizabeth II Jubilee Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. Christopher.Bell@health.qld.gov.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionKnee extension deficit or loss of extension (LOE) is a potential complication following ACL reconstruction (ACLR); however, the change in postoperative knee extension during rehabilitation is not well defined. The aim of this review is to establish the trajectory of knee extension recovery and incidence of knee extension deficit during rehabilitation after ACL rupture. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic search will be conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and relevant trials databases of English language papers in publication as of May 2018, with no restrictions on publication year applied. References will be screened and assessed for eligibility by two independent reviewers as per the PRISMA guidelines. Cohort, cross-sectional or case-controlled studies will be included for the analysis. Data extraction will be conducted using a predefined template and quality of evidence assessed. Statistical summaries and meta-analyses will be performed as necessary. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This review will provide clearer definitions for the measurement and interpretation of postoperative knee extension and establish its natural history after ACL reconstruction. Evidence of the incidence and factors associated with loss of extension will be identified. The findings of this systematic review will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national/international conferences.

trial registrationThe protocol was registered on the PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews prior to commencement (registration number CRD42018092295 ).

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionClinical Trials as TopicHumansIncidenceKnee JointPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesRange of Motion, ArticularRecovery of FunctionSystematic Reviews as TopicTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID30922410
PMCPMC6437951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.