Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30922326›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2019

Detection of movement onset using EMG signals for upper-limb exoskeletons in reaching tasks.

Emilio Trigili, Lorenzo Grazi, Simona Crea, Alessandro Accogli, Jacopo Carpaneto, Silvestro Micera, Nicola Vitiello, Alessandro Panarese

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emilio TrigiliThe BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy. emilio.trigili@santannapisa.it.ORCID 0000-0002-3725-5694
Lorenzo GraziThe BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy.
Simona CreaThe BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy.
Alessandro AccogliThe BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy.
Jacopo CarpanetoThe BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy.
Silvestro MiceraThe BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy.
Nicola VitielloThe BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy.
Alessandro PanareseThe BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy.

Funding

H2020 LEIT Information and Communication Technologies 645322 - AIDE ProjectRegione Toscana Bando FAS Salute 2014 (RONDA Project)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo assist people with disabilities, exoskeletons must be provided with human-robot interfaces and smart algorithms capable to identify the user's movement intentions. Surface electromyographic (sEMG) signals could be suitable for this purpose, but their applicability in shared control schemes for real-time operation of assistive devices in daily-life activities is limited due to high inter-subject variability, which requires custom calibrations and training. Here, we developed a machine-learning-based algorithm for detecting the user's motion intention based on electromyographic signals, and discussed its applicability for controlling an upper-limb exoskeleton for people with severe arm disabilities.

methodsTen healthy participants, sitting in front of a screen while wearing the exoskeleton, were asked to perform several reaching movements toward three LEDs, presented in a random order. EMG signals from seven upper-limb muscles were recorded. Data were analyzed offline and used to develop an algorithm that identifies the onset of the movement across two different events: moving from a resting position toward the LED (Go-forward), and going back to resting position (Go-backward). A set of subject-independent time-domain EMG features was selected according to information theory and their probability distributions corresponding to rest and movement phases were modeled by means of a two-component Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM). The detection of movement onset by two types of detectors was tested: the first type based on features extracted from single muscles, whereas the second from multiple muscles. Their performances in terms of sensitivity, specificity and latency were assessed for the two events with a leave one-subject out test method.

resultsThe onset of movement was detected with a maximum sensitivity of 89.3% for Go-forward and 60.9% for Go-backward events. Best performances in terms of specificity were 96.2 and 94.3% respectively. For both events the algorithm was able to detect the onset before the actual movement, while computational load was compatible with real-time applications.

conclusionsThe detection performances and the low computational load make the proposed algorithm promising for the control of upper-limb exoskeletons in real-time applications. Fast initial calibration makes it also suitable for helping people with severe arm disabilities in performing assisted functional tasks.

Indexed as

Exoskeleton DeviceMachine LearningAdultElectromyographyFemaleHumansMaleMovementUpper ExtremityElectromyographyHuman-robot interfaceOnset detectionUpper-limb exoskeleton

Identifiers

PMID30922326
PMCPMC6440169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.