ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2019
Detection of movement onset using EMG signals for upper-limb exoskeletons in reaching tasks.
Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Systematic review of AI/ML applications in multi-domain robotic rehabilitation: trends, gaps, and future directions.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Pooled it
- Myoelectric Control Systems for Upper Limb Wearable Robotic Exoskeletons and Exosuits-A Systematic Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Pooled it
- Is EMG Information Necessary for Deep Learning Estimation of Joint and Muscle Level States?IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2026Article
- A dexterous soft hand exoskeleton restores intentional grasping in individuals with severe hand impairment.Nature machine intelligence · 2026Article
- Myoelectric and Inertial Data Fusion Through a Novel Attention-Based Spatiotemporal Feature Extraction for Transhumeral Prosthetic Control: An Offline Analysis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Electromyography Signal Acquisition, Filtering, and Data Analysis for Exoskeleton Development.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Upper limb human-exoskeleton system motion state classification based on semg: application of CNN-BiLSTM-attention model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Synergistic Torso-Muscle-Controlled Detached Robotic Hand: A Novel Approach for Post-Stroke Hand Rehabilitation.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Surface EMG Sensing and Granular Gesture Recognition for Rehabilitative Pouring Tasks: A Case Study.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Integrated Lower Limb Robotic Orthosis with Embedded Highly Oriented Electrospinning Sensors by Fuzzy Logic-Based Gait Phase Detection and Motion Control.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Machine Learning- and Deep Learning-Based Myoelectric Control System for Upper Limb Rehabilitation Utilizing EEG and EMG Signals: A Systematic Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Developing a Vital Signal Detection Electrode for Fabric Substrate Using a High-Performance Conductive Carbon-Based Ink.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2025Article
- Electrical stimulation in upper limb assistance: opportunities and challenges.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Review
- Fusion of EEG and EMG signals for detecting pre-movement intention of sitting and standing in healthy individuals and patients with spinal cord injury.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Proportional myoelectric control of a virtual bionic arm in participants with hemiparesis, muscle spasticity, and impaired range of motion.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2024Article
- Assessing Credibility in Bayesian Networks Structure Learning.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Elbow Gesture Recognition with an Array of Inductive Sensors and Machine Learning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A survey on the state of the art of force myography technique (FMG): analysis and assessment.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2024Review
- Simulation of a control method for active kinesiotherapy with an upper extremity rehabilitation exoskeleton without force sensor.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2024Article
- Comparison of sEMG Onset Detection Methods for Occupational Exoskeletons on Extensive Close-to-Application Data.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo assist people with disabilities, exoskeletons must be provided with human-robot interfaces and smart algorithms capable to identify the user's movement intentions. Surface electromyographic (sEMG) signals could be suitable for this purpose, but their applicability in shared control schemes for real-time operation of assistive devices in daily-life activities is limited due to high inter-subject variability, which requires custom calibrations and training. Here, we developed a machine-learning-based algorithm for detecting the user's motion intention based on electromyographic signals, and discussed its applicability for controlling an upper-limb exoskeleton for people with severe arm disabilities.
methodsTen healthy participants, sitting in front of a screen while wearing the exoskeleton, were asked to perform several reaching movements toward three LEDs, presented in a random order. EMG signals from seven upper-limb muscles were recorded. Data were analyzed offline and used to develop an algorithm that identifies the onset of the movement across two different events: moving from a resting position toward the LED (Go-forward), and going back to resting position (Go-backward). A set of subject-independent time-domain EMG features was selected according to information theory and their probability distributions corresponding to rest and movement phases were modeled by means of a two-component Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM). The detection of movement onset by two types of detectors was tested: the first type based on features extracted from single muscles, whereas the second from multiple muscles. Their performances in terms of sensitivity, specificity and latency were assessed for the two events with a leave one-subject out test method.
resultsThe onset of movement was detected with a maximum sensitivity of 89.3% for Go-forward and 60.9% for Go-backward events. Best performances in terms of specificity were 96.2 and 94.3% respectively. For both events the algorithm was able to detect the onset before the actual movement, while computational load was compatible with real-time applications.
conclusionsThe detection performances and the low computational load make the proposed algorithm promising for the control of upper-limb exoskeletons in real-time applications. Fast initial calibration makes it also suitable for helping people with severe arm disabilities in performing assisted functional tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.